Skip to content

HTTPS clone URL

Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with
or
.
Download ZIP
Browse files

No substantive changes in Feb 21 2013 needs-work.txt list

Just update the date, and include all of my reformatted paragraphs for
the comments I wrote about some of the tickets.
  • Loading branch information...
commit ae272521ae8e2e4c7229fe7ea3e7cef7055c9689 1 parent 6e76d37
@jafingerhut authored
Showing with 21 additions and 21 deletions.
  1. +21 −21 clj-ticket-status/needs-work.txt
View
42 clj-ticket-status/needs-work.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Tickets needing work for CLJ project
-Date: February 14, 2013
+Date: February 21, 2013
If you are a Clojure contributor, the tickets below could use some
work. Some are easy, some are not. If you've never added a patch
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ I CLJ-1122 contributing.patch
Clojure language/library bug fixes:
N CLJ-945 capitalize-for-supplementary-chars-patch.txt
- TBD: Stuart H marked the one patch Screened, then Rich changed it to
- Not Approved with a comment. Andy F answered his comment, but the
- patch did not require any change in order to answer that comment.
- Should it be marked as Screened again since the patch hasn't
- changed?
+ TBD: Stuart H marked the one patch Screened, then Rich changed
+ it to Not Approved with a comment. Andy F answered his comment,
+ but the patch did not require any change in order to answer that
+ comment. Should it be marked as Screened again since the patch
+ hasn't changed?
Allow more correct-looking Clojure code to work:
@@ -64,29 +64,29 @@ I CLJ-373 0001-Support-empty-path-in-update-in.-CLJ-373.patch
I CLJ-771 clj-771-move-unchecked-casts-patch-v5.txt
TBD: The patch clj-771-move-unchecked-casts-patch-v5.txt applies
- cleanly to latest master and passes all tests. Rich marked this ticket
- as Incomplete on Dec 9 2011 with the comment "still considering when
- to incorporate this" above. Is it reasonable to change it back to
- Vetted or Screened so it can be considered again, perhaps after
- Release 1.5 is made?
+ cleanly to latest master and passes all tests. Rich marked this
+ ticket as Incomplete on Dec 9 2011 with the comment "still
+ considering when to incorporate this" above. Is it reasonable
+ to change it back to Vetted or Screened so it can be considered
+ again, perhaps after Release 1.5 is made?
N CLJ-957 clj-957-allow-typehinting-of-method-signatures-in-deftype-patch2.txt
- TBD: Why marked Not Approved by Rich? Should this be closed, or does
- he want something about the existing patches modified before
- considering it?
+ TBD: Why marked Not Approved by Rich? Should this be closed, or
+ does he want something about the existing patches modified
+ before considering it?
N CLJ-958 0001-Make-APersistentVector.iterator-slightly-more-effici.patch
- TBD: Why marked Not Approved by Rich? Should this be closed, or does
- he want something about the existing patches modified before
- considering it?
+ TBD: Why marked Not Approved by Rich? Should this be closed, or
+ does he want something about the existing patches modified
+ before considering it?
N CLJ-1063 clj-1063-add-dissoc-in-patch-v2.txt
TBD: Open ticket for clojure.incubator for this.
Disable failing tests:
N CLJ-967 clj-967-disable-failing-io-copy-tests-on-ibm-jdk-16-patch1.txt
- TBD: Stuart H marked the one patch Screened, then Rich changed it to
- Not Approved without any comment as to why. There is no guidance on
- what Rich is looking for in order for this ticket to change state in
- the future.
+ TBD: Stuart H marked the one patch Screened, then Rich changed
+ it to Not Approved without any comment as to why. There is no
+ guidance on what Rich is looking for in order for this ticket to
+ change state in the future.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tickets marked for Clojure release 1.5 that have no prescreened
Please sign in to comment.
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.