\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction-changes.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction-changes.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fb14f6a99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction-changes.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', 'Frameworks by 1-year change in usage and satisfaction') }}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2021—2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Framework
+
Usage change (%)
+
Satisfaction change
+
Usage
+
+
+
+
+
1. React
+
2.9%
+
-1.4
+
71%
+
+
+
2. Express
+
-2.3%
+
-0.2
+
49%
+
+
+
3. Next.js
+
3.8%
+
-2.8
+
47%
+
+
+
4. jQuery
+
-6.8%
+
0.1
+
44%
+
+
+
5. Vue
+
-6.4%
+
-2.1
+
33%
+
+
+
6. Vite
+
17.8%
+
0.1
+
32%
+
+
+
7. Gatsby
+
-8.9%
+
-1.0
+
28%
+
+
+
8. Nuxt.js
+
-2.8%
+
-2.9
+
22%
+
+
+
9. Angular 2+
+
0.1%
+
-0.2
+
20%
+
+
+
10. 11ty
+
1.6%
+
-2.2
+
19%
+
+
+
11. Svelte
+
4.6%
+
-0.2
+
19%
+
+
+
12. SvelteKit
+
6.9%
+
-2.0
+
15%
+
+
+
13. Jekyll
+
-2.5%
+
-0.1
+
14%
+
+
+
14. Angular 1.x
+
-1.3%
+
0.1
+
14%
+
+
+
15. Hugo
+
-1.8%
+
-0.1
+
13%
+
+
+
16. Preact
+
1.5%
+
-0.7
+
12%
+
+
+
17. Remix
+
7.7%
+
0.9
+
10%
+
+
+
18. Nest
+
0.2%
+
-0.6
+
9%
+
+
+
19. VuePress
+
-0.8%
+
-0.7
+
8%
+
+
+
20. Gridsome
+
-1.5%
+
-0.9
+
7%
+
+
+
21. Docusaurus
+
0.8%
+
0.6
+
7%
+
+
+
22. Hapi
+
0.4%
+
-0.3
+
6%
+
+
+
23. Sapper
+
-1.1%
+
-0.5
+
5%
+
+
+
24. Stencil
+
0.7%
+
-0.3
+
5%
+
+
+
25. RedwoodJS
+
-0.3%
+
1.2
+
4%
+
+
+
26. Blitz.js
+
0.7%
+
1.0
+
4%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..392823a9b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', 'Frameworks by usage and satisfaction') }}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Language
+
Used on "some" or "many" projects
+
Satisfaction score
+
+
+
+
+
1. React
+
71%
+
2.9
+
+
+
2. Express
+
49%
+
1.7
+
+
+
3. Next.js
+
47%
+
4.2
+
+
+
4. jQuery
+
44%
+
0.3
+
+
+
5. Vue
+
33%
+
3.1
+
+
+
6. Vite
+
32%
+
9.7
+
+
+
7. Gatsby
+
28%
+
0.9
+
+
+
8. Nuxt.js
+
22%
+
2.7
+
+
+
9. Angular 2+
+
20%
+
0.7
+
+
+
10. 11ty
+
19%
+
3.8
+
+
+
11. Svelte
+
19%
+
5.3
+
+
+
12. SvelteKit
+
15%
+
4.0
+
+
+
13. Jekyll
+
14%
+
0.4
+
+
+
14. Angular 1.x
+
14%
+
0.3
+
+
+
15. Hugo
+
13%
+
1.2
+
+
+
16. Preact
+
12%
+
2.0
+
+
+
17. Astro
+
11%
+
4.5
+
+
+
18. Remix
+
10%
+
2.3
+
+
+
19. Nest
+
9%
+
2.0
+
+
+
20. VuePress
+
8%
+
1.7
+
+
+
21. Gridsome
+
7%
+
0.8
+
+
+
22. Docusaurus
+
7%
+
2.5
+
+
+
23. Hapi
+
6%
+
1.0
+
+
+
24. SolidJS
+
6%
+
2.0
+
+
+
25. Sapper
+
5%
+
0.7
+
+
+
26. Stencil
+
5%
+
1.5
+
+
+
27. Quasar
+
4%
+
1.0
+
+
+
28. RedwoodJS
+
4%
+
3.0
+
+
+
29. Blitz.js
+
4%
+
3.0
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/index.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/index.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..290136c48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/index.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+
+ {{
+ permalinkHeading.render(
+ "h2",
+ "How are we building?",
+ "",
+ "how-are-we-building"
+ )
+ }}
+
+
+ Our largest set of questions revolve around technical choices. It’s easy for
+ this kind of data to turn into a popularity contest, so we should be clear:
+ the most popular choice is not always the best choice for you. As we’ll see
+ shortly, your use case matters much more than total adoption of a
+ technology. However, within the bounds of a use case, popularity can help.
+ Open source technology benefits from more contributors: bugs are fixed
+ faster, documentation is better, rough edges are smoothed away more quickly,
+ and there will be more plugins and third-party integrations.
+
+
+ {{
+ permalinkHeading.render(
+ "h3",
+ "A note on how to read Usage + Satisfaction graphs"
+ )
+ }}
+
+
+ This section contains a number of graphs like the one below. On the
+ horizontal axis, we measure the usage of a technology, as measured by the
+ number of people who say they have used that technology in the last year on
+ “some projects” or “many projects”. We do not count people who say they use
+ a technology “rarely”, so we believe our “some+many” number represents real,
+ regular usage.
+
+
+
+ At the same time as we ask people how often they use a technology, we ask
+ them whether they would like to use it more or less in the coming year. We
+ take the ratio of the “want to use it more” and the “want to use it less”
+ numbers to create our vertical axis, which we call the “Satisfaction score”.
+ A score of 1.0 or more means the technology’s users are on balance
+ enthusiastic about it, while under 1.0 it means they are not. In the three
+ years of our survey, a satisfaction score under 1.0 has been strongly (but
+ not perfectly) predictive of a loss in usage the following year, which high
+ satisfaction scores correlate well to growth in share.
+
+ The decoupled nature of frontend and backend code in the Jamstack ecosystem
+ means that CMS are a big component of many of the websites we build. As
+ anyone who’s built a site with one knows, once a CMS has become embedded
+ into your company’s culture and workflows it can be hard to get it out
+ again, so this is a critical choice for many people.
+
+
+
+
+ The overall leader in the CMS space remains WordPress, as it has been for
+ many years. However, with a satisfaction score of just 0.5, unenthusiastic
+ users of WordPress outnumber enthusiastic ones 2-to-1, and WordPress has
+ lost usage share over the course of our surveys.
+
+
+ WordPress used as an API (“headless” mode) has more enthusiastic users
+ than WordPress in traditional mode, and a substantial 22% share, but this
+ share has been growing only slowly.
+
+
+ Notion is something of an outlier in this data: certainly some people are
+ using it via its API to power websites, but we believe many people who
+ answered yes to this option are using it for internal content. We intend
+ to run a small follow-up survey to confirm this.
+
+
+ Given high satisfaction scores, Sanity and Strapi were our choices in last
+ year’s survey to be breakout contenders in this year's, and they both grew
+ share, though not as much as we had expected. Contentful lost usage share
+ in this year’s survey compared to last year’s.
+
+
+ Of the smaller CMS systems, Storyblok is notable for high satisfaction.
+ This is the first year we’ve tracked it and it came in at 8% share, so
+ we’ll be looking for it to grow.
+
+ There are not a lot of surprises in this year’s programming language data if
+ you have seen our previous surveys. One note: when we show programming
+ languages, we should be clear that this data is about their popularity
+ within the Jamstack community; in more general computing surveys Java is a
+ much more popular choice.
+
+
+
+
+ JavaScript remains the near-universal choice, with 96% of respondents
+ saying they have used it in some or many projects in the last year.
+
+
+ TypeScript continues rapid growth, hitting 67% usage this year, overtaking
+ SQL as the second-most used language.
+
+
+ When asked about their primary programming language, 53%
+ of people still say JavaScript, a number that has declined in all 3 years
+ of our survey, while 21% say TypeScript is their primary language, more
+ than doubling its usage as a primary language. The continuing migration
+ from JavaScript to TypeScript is a trend we are following closely.
+
+ Always our largest section, we tracked 29 frameworks this year, with a few
+ that we have tracked in previous years falling out of the survey (our
+ cut-off for frameworks that are not growing quickly is 4% share).
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h4", "React and Next.js") }}
+
+
+ The most obvious story in our framework data is the continued growth of
+ React. With high satisfaction scores last year, we predicted it would
+ continue to grow and that was borne out this year, hitting a new record of
+ 71% share, the highest of any framework we’ve tracked in all 3 years. While
+ there are many options for building a reactive web app, the enormous
+ ecosystem around React continues to make it an easy choice for many.
+
+
+
+ Riding the tails of React’s popularity is Next.js, a full featured “kitchen
+ sink” framework based on React. This year 47%, or nearly 1 in 2 developers
+ say they used Next.js in some or many projects, and with a satisfaction
+ score over 4.0 we expect to see it continue to grow.
+
+ Although we have been tracking it in our frameworks data, Vite is more of a
+ bundler, competing with choices such as Webpack and Babel. It has been
+ adopted as the default bundler for several other frameworks including Nuxt
+ and SvelteKit, contributing to its high share, but its stellar satisfaction
+ score is all its own.
+
+
+ {% include './frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk' %}
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h4", "Zooming in on smaller frameworks") }}
+
+
+ Looking at the crowded bottom-left corner of the overall frameworks graph
+ can hide some detail, so we take a closer look at frameworks at 10% share or
+ less. In here are some older frameworks such as Hapi and Gridsome, but also
+ some new entrants.
+
+
+
+
+ Remix jumped from 2% share in last year’s survey to 10% this year, and is
+ an exciting new contender in the space. At the end of October Remix
+ announced they have been
+ acquired by Shopify
+ so it will be interesting to see what effect that has on their trajectory.
+
+
+ Docusaurus does one thing very well and has been rewarded with
+ consistently high satisfaction scores and modest growth.
+
+
SolidJS, a new entry to our survey, clocks in at 6% share.
+
+
+ {% include './smaller-frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk' %}
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h4", "Tracking usage and satisfaction changes") }}
+
+
+ We have found it instructive to look at how usage and satisfaction scores in
+ our survey have changed from year to year. Keep in mind that these are
+ changes; Next.js and Nuxt.js for example both have high
+ satisfaction scores overall, just lower than last year. We split this graph
+ into four quadrants.
+
+ A pattern we have seen every year is that frameworks that grow share usually
+ lose satisfaction score while doing so. This makes sense: as more people
+ adopt a technology, there are fewer enthusiastic early adopters, and more
+ people using the framework for use cases that are outside of its sweet spot.
+
+
+
+
+ React and Next.js both show growth in share and loss in satisfaction, as
+ expected.
+
+
+ Svelte and SvelteKit, another component-framework pair, did the same.
+
+
+ 11ty was the only purely static site generator (SSG) in our survey to show
+ growth in usage share. For this reason we think 11ty is now the clear
+ choice if a static site is your use case.
+
+ Losing usage share and satisfaction score at the same time is bad news for
+ project maintainers.
+
+
+
+
+ Gatsby has lost share in all 3 years of our survey, and its 0.9
+ satisfaction score indicates this trend is likely to continue.
+
+
+ Vue and Nuxt.js are new to this quadrant; in last year’s survey they were
+ still growing. The continued growth of React and Next.js makes it
+ difficult for similar alternatives to compete.
+
+
+
+ {% include './frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction-changes.njk' %}
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/programming-language-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/programming-language-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dfc28aeba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/programming-language-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', 'Programming languages by usage and satisfaction') }}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Language
+
Used on "some" or "many" projects
+
Satisfaction score
+
+
+
+
+
1. JavaScript
+
96%
+
3.0
+
+
+
2. TypeScript
+
67%
+
7.4
+
+
+
3. SQL
+
64%
+
1.8
+
+
+
4. Shell (Bash)
+
53%
+
1.5
+
+
+
5. Python
+
42%
+
2.2
+
+
+
6. PHP
+
42%
+
0.6
+
+
+
7. Java
+
26%
+
0.6
+
+
+
8. C#
+
21%
+
1.1
+
+
+
9. Ruby
+
18%
+
1.0
+
+
+
10. C/C++
+
17%
+
1.1
+
+
+
11. Go
+
16%
+
2.2
+
+
+
12. Rust
+
12%
+
3.0
+
+
+
13. Visual Basic
+
10%
+
0.7
+
+
+
14. Swift
+
9%
+
2.0
+
+
+
15. Objective-C
+
6%
+
0.5
+
+
+
16. Perl
+
6%
+
0.5
+
+
+
17. Elixir
+
6%
+
1.5
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/smaller-frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/smaller-frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8407a6390
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/how-are-we-building/smaller-frameworks-usage-vs-satisfaction.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', 'Smaller frameworks by usage and satisfaction') }}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Framework
+
Used on "some" or "many" projects
+
Satisfaction score
+
+
+
+
+
1. Remix
+
10%
+
2.3
+
+
+
2. Nest
+
9%
+
2.0
+
+
+
3. VuePress
+
8%
+
1.7
+
+
+
4. Gridsome
+
7%
+
0.8
+
+
+
5. Docusaurus
+
7%
+
2.5
+
+
+
6. Hapi
+
6%
+
1.0
+
+
+
7. SolidJS
+
6%
+
2.0
+
+
+
8. Sapper
+
5%
+
0.7
+
+
+
9. Stencil
+
5%
+
1.5
+
+
+
10. Quasar
+
4%
+
1.0
+
+
+
11. RedwoodJS
+
4%
+
3.0
+
+
+
12. Blitz.js
+
4%
+
3.0
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/audience-sizes.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/audience-sizes.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0321629d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/audience-sizes.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "How many users are the websites you're building meant to serve?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2020—2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
2020
+
2021
+
2022
+
+
+
+
+
10s of users
+
63%
+
65%
+
64%
+
+
+
100s of users
+
78%
+
77%
+
74%
+
+
+
1000s of users
+
83%
+
79%
+
75%
+
+
+
100-000s of users
+
58%
+
55%
+
55%
+
+
+
1-000-000s of users
+
32%
+
32%
+
36%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/index.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/index.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ea36e74f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/index.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+
+ {{
+ permalinkHeading.render(
+ "h2",
+ "What is the Jamstack Community building?",
+ "",
+ "what-is-the-jamstack-community-building"
+ )
+ }}
+
+
Moving on from demographics, let’s look at what we’re building in 2022.
+ Most people build lots of sites in a year, so we allowed people to give
+ multiple answers to our question about what the sites they built were for.
+ The results were similar to last year: the single most common answer was
+ personal websites (such as blogs or resumes). Consumer software, B2B
+ software and e-commerce remained major areas of focus.
+
+ Another question we repeated from last year was asking people what kinds of
+ websites they built. As was the case in 2021, Single Page Apps (SPAs) were
+ popular, but a majority were various levels of static websites – either
+ fully or mostly static. This is unsurprising, since the core of Jamstack has
+ always been progressive enhancement of static websites.
+
+
+
+ Fully dynamic websites remain popular for some applications, and this time
+ we asked about a new category: edge-dynamic sites, which we’re defining here
+ as sites that are fully dynamic, and render all their content at the edge
+ (i.e. using serverless functions or edge functions). This is a pretty new
+ category and so it was also the smallest, but nearly half (47%) said they’d
+ built at least one website of this kind this year. This tracks the
+ growth in serverless
+ we saw in later questions.
+
+ Another standard question we ask every year is about what devices your work
+ targets. We’ve used this previously to point out that while “mobile-first”
+ has been the mantra of the industry for a long time, desktop devices still
+ have a small edge in terms of being the most important target for our work,
+ with tablets third.
+
+
+
+ However, over the last 3 years our “everything else” category, called
+ “device-specific browsers” (we suggested things like Internet of Things
+ devices, or smart watches) has been steadily growing and now fully one-third
+ of people say this somewhat poorly defined fourth category is at least
+ somewhat important. This was a surprise! We’ll be conducting follow-up
+ surveys to discover what exactly the folks who call these devices important
+ were talking about.
+
+ Our final question about the goals of our websites in 2022 was about
+ audience sizes: how big is the audience your website serves? This is another
+ question where we have data from all 3 years of the survey and are able to
+ see a trend, although not much has changed. The most common type of website
+ remains one built for a relatively small audience – hundreds, or a few
+ thousand users. But more than a third of people say they’ve built websites
+ this year intended for audiences of millions, and this category grew in
+ 2022.
+
+
+ {% include './audience-sizes.njk' %}
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/target-devices-by-type.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/target-devices-by-type.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a2f09aa19
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/target-devices-by-type.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+
Percentage of respondents saying these targets were somewhat or very important
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2020—2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Type
+
2020
+
2021
+
2022
+
+
+
+
+
Desktops
+
99%
+
98%
+
97%
+
+
+
Phones
+
95%
+
94%
+
94%
+
+
+
Tablets
+
92%
+
91%
+
90%
+
+
+
Device-specific browsers
+
18%
+
25%
+
34%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/types-of-sites-built-last-12-months.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/types-of-sites-built-last-12-months.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..88dcca2bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/types-of-sites-built-last-12-months.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "Types of websites built in the last 12 months") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
None
+
A few projects
+
Many projects
+
Most projects
+
All
+
+
+
+
+
SPA
+
20%
+
41%
+
15%
+
16%
+
8%
+
+
+
Fully dynamic
+
28%
+
36%
+
15%
+
15%
+
6%
+
+
+
Edge-dynamic
+
53%
+
30%
+
9%
+
6%
+
3%
+
+
+
Mostly static
+
26%
+
43%
+
17%
+
11%
+
3%
+
+
+
Fully static
+
30%
+
40%
+
15%
+
11%
+
4%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/what-is-the-purpose-of-the-sites-you-built-in-2022.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/what-is-the-purpose-of-the-sites-you-built-in-2022.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..08341a4b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/what-are-we-building/what-is-the-purpose-of-the-sites-you-built-in-2022.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "What is the purpose of the websites you built in 2022?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Purpose
+
Percentage of Survey Participants
+
+
+
+
+
Personal websites
+
45%
+
+
+
Consumer software
+
40%
+
+
+
B2B software
+
39%
+
+
+
E-commerce
+
38%
+
+
+
Informational
+
38%
+
+
+
Internal tools
+
37%
+
+
+
Documentation
+
29%
+
+
+
Lead capture
+
29%
+
+
+
Enterprise software
+
26%
+
+
+
News/Entertainment
+
14%
+
+
+
Social media
+
14%
+
+
+
Retail
+
13%
+
+
+
Games
+
11%
+
+
+
Streaming media
+
9%
+
+
+
Politics/Activism
+
5%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/index.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/index.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9e802ea32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/index.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+
+ {{
+ permalinkHeading.render(
+ "h2",
+ "Emerging Trends in the Jamstack Community",
+ "",
+ "emerging-trends-in-the-jamstack-community"
+ )
+ }}
+
+
+ In addition to the current state of the Jamstack community, we also gathered
+ some data about emerging trends, and tried to use our data to make some
+ predictions about where we expect things will go in 2023.
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h3", "Trends in web frameworks") }}
+
+
+ The continued dominance of React in the web framework landscape seems set to
+ continue, and we expect further growth from React and its allied Next.js in
+ 2023. But React is only one of many possible ways to build a useful website.
+
+
+
+ If you’re looking for interactivity with high performance and a low resource
+ footprint, such as if your user base is primarily mobile, you might want to
+ look at Astro or Sveltekit.
+
+
+
+ As we mentioned already, if you’re building a static or nearly-static site,
+ we continue to think 11ty is an excellent choice given its growth relative
+ to other SSGs in the space.
+
+ We heard a great deal on social media in 2022 about Web3, so we included a
+ couple of specific questions about Web3 technologies in this year’s survey
+ (after running a small pre-survey, we did not include the Metaverse in our
+ definition of Web3, as a majority of respondents did not think of it as part
+ of Web3).
+
+
+
+ Overall, only about 10% of respondents said they had tried out any of the
+ Web3 technologies we asked about. Applying the same “some or many projects”
+ standard that we do when counting web frameworks, Web3 technologies did not
+ cross 3% usage.
+
+
+ {% include './web3-usage.njk' %}
+
+
+ Low usage is to be expected in an early technology, so we also asked
+ sentiment questions. 13% of respondents did not know what Web3 was, while
+ another third were neutral towards it. Of those who expressed feelings about
+ Web3, those who were negative about it (31%) slightly outnumbered those who
+ were positive about it (28%). If we translate this into the satisfaction
+ score we use elsewhere in the survey, it would be 0.9, and we would expect
+ Web3 to lose usage share in the coming year.
+
+
+ {% include './web3-feelings.njk' %}
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h3", "Web Components have arrived") }}
+
+
+ Browser-native Web Components were introduced 11 years ago but lacked
+ support from all major browsers until roughly
+ 2018. Since then, their adoption has accelerated notably, and while they are
+ still not in use by the majority of our respondents we believe we can call
+ them a solid choice in 2022.
+
+
+
+ Using the same standards we apply to web frameworks, native Web Components
+ have usage of 32%. Even more positively, their Satisfaction Score is 4.3, so
+ we expect rapid growth in the adoption of web components in 2023.
+
+
+ {% include './web-components.njk' %}
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h3", "Jamstack is Increasingly Serverless") }}
+
+
+ The final trend we covered was the growth in serverless technology,
+ sometimes also called edge computing. Last year we were taken somewhat by
+ surprise to learn that serverless adoption had hit 46%, so this year we made
+ sure to ask a more detailed question.
+
+
+
+ Using the standard we used last year of any adoption at all, serverless
+ usage jumped from 46% to 71%. We expected growth, but that was much faster
+ than we predicted. Applying our usual standard of “some+many” projects we
+ use for web frameworks, serverless technology is at 35% adoption, which
+ relative to frameworks would make it bigger than Vue but smaller than
+ Next.js.
+
+
+
+ We mentioned above that there was a big shift in the last year of people
+ describing themselves as “full stack” developers from “front end”
+ developers. We think the big jump in serverless adoption may be the
+ explanation: serverless lets front-end developers build full-stack
+ applications with a minimum of fuss, and the adoption has been so fast it’s
+ changing how we describe ourselves.
+
+
+
+ Given the rapid growth since last year, we expect to see further growth in
+ adoption and especially users moving from the “few projects” category into
+ more serious usage.
+
+
+ {% include './serverless.njk' %}
+
+
+ Jamstack remains the standard architecture of the web
+
+
+
+ The evolution of the web as a platform continues to be rapid and exciting,
+ with new technologies pushing the boundaries of what the web can do and how
+ quickly developers can ship. We’ve also learned more about our community as
+ human beings: where they are, who they are, and what motivates them.
+
+
+
+ We hope giving you a sense of the community you’re part of and the
+ technologies that your peers use gives you a sense of place and some ideas
+ about where you should put your time and energy in the next year.
+
+
+
+ Once again, we’d like to thank everybody who participated in the community
+ survey.
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/serverless.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/serverless.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b0c42ca28
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/serverless.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "How many websites you've built this year have used serverless functions?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
Count
+
+
+
+
+
None
+
30%
+
+
+
A few projects
+
36%
+
+
+
Some projects
+
18%
+
+
+
Many projects
+
12%
+
+
+
All
+
5%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/web-components.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/web-components.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..09fbf9448
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/web-components.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "How much have you used Web Components in the last 12 months?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
Count
+
+
+
+
+
Not aware of them
+
23%
+
+
+
Rarely and don't want to
+
16%
+
+
+
Rarely but want more
+
29%
+
+
+
Some and want fewer
+
5%
+
+
+
Some and want more
+
19%
+
+
+
Many and want fewer
+
1%
+
+
+
Many and want more
+
7%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/web3-feelings.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/web3-feelings.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c3afe692b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/web3-feelings.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "In general, how do you feel about Web3?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
In general, how do you feel about Web3?
+
Count
+
+
+
+
+
I don't know what it is
+
13%
+
+
+
Strongly negative
+
18%
+
+
+
Negative
+
13%
+
+
+
Neutral
+
29%
+
+
+
Positive
+
20%
+
+
+
Strongly positive
+
8%
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/web3-usage.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/web3-usage.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6e579c002
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/where-are-we-going/web3-usage.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "Which Web3 technologies did you use in the last 12 months?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
None
+
A few projects
+
Many projects
+
Most projects
+
All
+
+
+
+
+
Bitcoin
+
89%
+
7%
+
1%
+
1%
+
1%
+
+
+
Ethereum
+
87%
+
9%
+
1%
+
1%
+
1%
+
+
+
Solana
+
93%
+
4%
+
1%
+
1%
+
1%
+
+
+
Other blockchain
+
89%
+
7%
+
1%
+
1%
+
1%
+
+
+
DAOs
+
93%
+
4%
+
1%
+
1%
+
1%
+
+
+
Other dApps
+
90%
+
6%
+
2%
+
1%
+
1%
+
+
+
NFTs
+
86%
+
10%
+
2%
+
1%
+
1%
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/employment-status.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/employment-status.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..18263c682
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/employment-status.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "What's your employment status?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Employment Status
+
Percentage of Survey Participants
+
+
+
+
+
Full-time
+
50%
+
+
+
Student
+
21%
+
+
+
Self-employed
+
13%
+
+
+
Contractor
+
6%
+
+
+
Part-time
+
5%
+
+
+
Between jobs
+
5%
+
+
+
Retired
+
1%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/experience-by-region.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/experience-by-region.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..88238164d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/experience-by-region.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h5', "Experience by region") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Years of experience
+
Africa
+
Asia Pacific
+
Central America
+
Eastern Asia
+
Europe
+
Middle East
+
North America
+
South America
+
Southern Asia
+
Caribbean
+
+
+
+
+
< 1
+
9.3%
+
21.1%
+
0.5%
+
3.6%
+
21.7%
+
2.1%
+
21.7%
+
7.2%
+
12.9%
+
0.0%
+
+
+
1-2
+
12.4%
+
16.4%
+
1.2%
+
0.7%
+
27.9%
+
0.9%
+
21.6%
+
5.9%
+
12.0%
+
0.9%
+
+
+
3-4
+
8.4%
+
13.1%
+
1.3%
+
2.2%
+
37.4%
+
2.2%
+
24.5%
+
4.5%
+
5.4%
+
1.1%
+
+
+
5-6
+
5.7%
+
12.9%
+
2.5%
+
2.0%
+
34.5%
+
2.2%
+
28.3%
+
6.2%
+
3.7%
+
2.0%
+
+
+
7-8
+
3.7%
+
6.7%
+
0.7%
+
1.9%
+
39.6%
+
0.7%
+
37.0%
+
3.0%
+
5.6%
+
1.1%
+
+
+
9-10
+
2.5%
+
5.8%
+
1.1%
+
0.4%
+
42.4%
+
0.7%
+
40.6%
+
4.7%
+
1.1%
+
0.7%
+
+
+
11-12
+
3.8%
+
5.0%
+
0.6%
+
1.3%
+
51.9%
+
1.3%
+
32.5%
+
3.1%
+
0.6%
+
0.0%
+
+
+
13-14
+
3.5%
+
8.1%
+
0.0%
+
0.0%
+
39.1%
+
5.8%
+
35.6%
+
2.3%
+
5.8%
+
0.0%
+
+
+
15+
+
0.7%
+
8.0%
+
0.5%
+
1.1%
+
40.3%
+
1.5%
+
44.1%
+
2.0%
+
1.3%
+
0.5%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/experience-increasing-over-time.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/experience-increasing-over-time.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..34acd9653
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/experience-increasing-over-time.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "Experience increasing over time") }}
+
Years of experience relevant to current job, 2020-2022
+
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2020—2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Years of experience
+
2020
+
2021
+
2022
+
+
+
+
+
< 1
+
4%
+
13%
+
8%
+
+
+
1-2
+
13%
+
19%
+
16%
+
+
+
3-4
+
20%
+
18%
+
16%
+
+
+
5-6
+
15%
+
12%
+
14%
+
+
+
7-8
+
9%
+
7%
+
9%
+
+
+
9-10
+
12%
+
8%
+
9%
+
+
+
11-12
+
8%
+
5%
+
5%
+
+
+
13-14
+
5%
+
3%
+
3%
+
+
+
15+
+
14%
+
14%
+
19%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/have-you-changed-jobs-in-the-last-12-months.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/have-you-changed-jobs-in-the-last-12-months.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..48fd52739
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/have-you-changed-jobs-in-the-last-12-months.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "Have you changed jobs in the last 12 months?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Have you changed jobs in the last 12 months?
+
Count
+
+
+
+
+
No
+
67%
+
+
+
Yes
+
33%
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-changed-jobs-to-work-remotely-more-often.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-changed-jobs-to-work-remotely-more-often.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c1e4dceb6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-changed-jobs-to-work-remotely-more-often.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "I changed jobs to work remotely more often") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
Percentage of Survey Participants
+
+
+
+
+
Strongly disagree
+
23%
+
+
+
Somewhat disagree
+
8%
+
+
+
Neither agree nor disagree
+
34%
+
+
+
Somewhat agree
+
12%
+
+
+
Strongly agree
+
23%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-enjoy-remote-work.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-enjoy-remote-work.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cabec9216
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-enjoy-remote-work.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "I enjoy remote work") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
Percentage of Survey Participants
+
+
+
+
+
Strongly disagree
+
3%
+
+
+
Somewhat disagree
+
4%
+
+
+
Neither agree nor disagree
+
7%
+
+
+
Somewhat agree
+
26%
+
+
+
Strongly agree
+
61%
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-would-like-to-work-remote-more-often.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-would-like-to-work-remote-more-often.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a41891b56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-would-like-to-work-remote-more-often.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "I would like to work remotely more often") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
Percentage of Survey Participants
+
+
+
+
+
Strongly disagree
+
5%
+
+
+
Somewhat disagree
+
8%
+
+
+
Neither agree nor disagree
+
28%
+
+
+
Somewhat agree
+
16%
+
+
+
Strongly agree
+
43%
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-would-quit-my-job-if-in-person-was-more-often.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-would-quit-my-job-if-in-person-was-more-often.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dafbc7cec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-would-quit-my-job-if-in-person-was-more-often.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "I would quit my job if they made me work in person more often") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
Percentage of Survey Participants
+
+
+
+
+
Strongly disagree
+
12%
+
+
+
Somewhat disagree
+
12%
+
+
+
Neither agree nor disagree
+
20%
+
+
+
Somewhat agree
+
27%
+
+
+
Strongly agree
+
28%
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-would-quit-my-job-if-remote-was-more-often.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-would-quit-my-job-if-remote-was-more-often.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8132c1a68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/i-would-quit-my-job-if-remote-was-more-often.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "I would quit my job if they made me work remotely more often") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
Percentage of Survey Participants
+
+
+
+
+
Strongly disagree
+
65%
+
+
+
Somewhat disagree
+
11%
+
+
+
Neither agree nor disagree
+
13%
+
+
+
Somewhat agree
+
5%
+
+
+
Strongly agree
+
6%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/index.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/index.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0305bd1a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/index.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h2", "Who’s doing the building?", "", "whos-doing-the-building") }}
+
+
+ As usual, we kick off by looking at the demographics of our community. Who
+ are we, exactly?
+
+ There was not much change in the breakdown of reported job titles in our
+ survey this year: as usual, nearly everyone (84%) who responded considers
+ themselves to be an engineer of some kind. There was one curious change,
+ however: the number of people calling themselves “full stack” versus “front
+ end” has almost exactly flipped, from 32% full stack and 45% front end last
+ year to 44% full stack and 33% front end in the 2022 survey. None of the
+ other demographic markers we tracked changed very much, so we believe this
+ is a real shift in how the community thinks of itself. We have two theories
+ about why this might be the case, and we’ll discuss them in the sections on
+ job changes and serverless.
+
+ This year when asking about employment status we added a new category,
+ “self-employed”, which meant that the results are not totally comparable to
+ last year. A bunch of people who last year described themselves as
+ “full-time” switched to the “self-employed” category, which probably doesn’t
+ describe an actual change in status but more accurately describes what they
+ already were. Students continue to be the second-biggest group in the
+ community, at 21% of all respondents. As we said last year, this is a
+ solidly positive sign for a community: the Jamstack remains a popular way to
+ on-board students at bootcamps into deploying websites for the first time,
+ and becoming the “default” way to build a website means the Jamstack can
+ expect to enjoy growth for years to come.
+
+ When asking about our community’s level of working experience, we saw a
+ continuing trend from 2020 and 2021: the community is slowly increasing in
+ experience. 2021 was our biggest year for new community members, and you can
+ see that cohort moving up by 1 year of experience in this chart. In 2022,
+ nearly 1 in 5 developers say they have been working in their current career
+ for 15 or more years.
+
+ Repeating a phenomenon we first noticed last year, the geographical
+ diversity of our respondents has a strong correlation to their level of
+ career experience. In the most experienced group, 84% of respondents come
+ from either North America or Europe. In our newest group, those with less
+ than a year of experience, that falls to just 43%. That means in 2022 for
+ the first time, more than half of people who joined the Jamstack community
+ came from outside of the two big regions!
+
+
+
+ An explanation for this correlation that we find persuasive is that access
+ to technology is continuing to improve worldwide, leading to increased
+ geographical diversity. We think this is an encouraging trend, and hope that
+ it will lead to greater diversity in other dimensions as well.
+
+
+
+ {% include "./experience-by-region.njk" %}
+
+
+ Every region outside of Europe and North America grew in share. The
+ fastest-growing region was Africa, which jumped from 4% of respondents to 8%
+ from 2021 to 2022. This author is also delighted to note that his home
+ region, the Caribbean, went from 0.5% to 1% in the same period.
+
+
+
+ {% include "./respondents-by-region.njk" %}
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h3", "The Great Resignation") }}
+
+
+ A phenomenon that gained a great deal of attention in 2021 was a spike in
+ the number of people changing jobs, which has become known as The Great
+ Resignation. We were interested to get hard numbers on the reality of this
+ change, and we were not disappointed: fully one-third of our respondents
+ reported that they changed jobs in the last year, a huge shift. In our job
+ titles data we saw a big change in job titles, with 11% switching from
+ front-end to full-stack roles, a change that seems totally plausible in the
+ context of a community where 33% of people changed jobs.
+
+
+
+ {% include "./have-you-changed-jobs-in-the-last-12-months.njk" %}
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h4", "Why people stay") }}
+
+
+ We had a second question about the great resignation asking people what
+ motivated their behavior – either why they stayed, or why they left. The
+ biggest reason people kept their jobs will be no surprise: people stay if
+ they like their team. Humans are social animals, and a team you love makes
+ work more bearable.
+
+
+
+ A more surprising finding was that the number two reason, as measured by
+ those who called it “extremely important”, was remote work. People really,
+ really like working remotely. Money was important, but it was only the
+ fifth-biggest reason people stayed where they were. Career growth was also a
+ very important reason to stay.
+
+
+
+ {% include "./what-influenced-staying.njk" %}
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h4", "Why people leave") }}
+
+
+ Why people left jobs was even heavier on remote work: being able to work
+ remotely at the new job was the number one reason people left their jobs in
+ our community, as measured by the number of people saying it was an
+ “extremely important” reason. Growing in your career came in second when
+ measured in this way, though if you include people who called things “very”
+ important in addition to “extremely” important it came first. Company
+ culture, bad teams, and not enough money came next.
+
+ Given that one-third of respondents changed jobs in the last year and many
+ indicated that remote work was their primary reason for either staying or
+ leaving a company, our next finding makes sense: a startling 83% of our
+ respondents say they work remotely at least half of the time. Three in five
+ (62%) work remotely at least 90% of the time, which we’re going to call
+ “full time remote”. In last year’s survey about a third said their job had
+ gone full-time remote, and we know from earlier surveys (such as
+ GitHub’s Octoverse report) that about a third of people were already working remotely before the
+ pandemic, so this is roughly double the pre-pandemic numbers.
+
+
+
+ {% include "./remote-frequency.njk" %}
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h4", "Changes in remote work") }}
+
+
+ Since a lot of remote work was driven by the pandemic and offices around the
+ world are still in the process of reopening, we thought it was fair to ask
+ whether or not this new state was going to be permanent, or whether people
+ were returning to offices, but slowly.
+
+
+
+ The clear response was that remote work is here to stay. A solid majority
+ (76%) of respondents said their frequency of remote work had either stayed
+ the same or increased in the last year. Indeed the strongest signal is that
+ this is the new normal: 52% of people said nothing changed about their
+ remote working situation, and the ratio of those working remotely more often
+ versus less often was just 1.04, meaning only a small net change.
+
+
+
+ {% include "./remote-changes.njk" %}
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h4", "Attitudes to remote work") }}
+
+
+ We also asked our community about their attitudes to various aspects of
+ remote work. 87% of respondents say they enjoy remote work, but only 71% say
+ their company has remote work “figured out”, which implies there’s 16% of
+ people enjoying remote work even though they believe their company doesn’t
+ do it very well.
+
+
+
+
+ {% include "./i-enjoy-remote-work.njk" %}
+ {% include "./my-company-has-remote-work-figured-out.njk" %}
+
+
+
+ As we suspected from the job change data, the number of people who would
+ like to work remotely even more often than they currently do is high: 59%.
+ And the number saying they changed jobs specifically to be able to work
+ remotely more often is 35%. That is a huge amount of change, and a strong
+ motivator.
+
+
+
+
+ {% include "./i-would-like-to-work-remote-more-often.njk" %}
+ {% include "./i-changed-jobs-to-work-remotely-more-often.njk" %}
+
+
+
+ Our final pair of questions about remote work determined two things: first,
+ we confirmed that it’s not just that people hate when their working
+ conditions change: asked if they would quit their jobs if asked to work
+ remotely more often, only 11% said they would, while 55% of respondents said
+ they would quit their jobs rather than work remotely less often.
+
+
+
+
+ {% include "./i-would-quit-my-job-if-remote-was-more-often.njk" %}
+ {% include "./i-would-quit-my-job-if-in-person-was-more-often.njk" %}
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/job-title-2021-vs-2022.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/job-title-2021-vs-2022.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d1bd78961
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/job-title-2021-vs-2022.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', 'Job titles, 2021 vs. 2022') }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Job Title
+
2021
+
2022
+
+
+
+
+
Developer (full-stack)
+
32%
+
44%
+
+
+
Developer (front-end)
+
45%
+
33%
+
+
+
Developer (back-end)
+
5%
+
5%
+
+
+
Designer
+
4%
+
4%
+
+
+
Manager
+
6%
+
4%
+
+
+
Executive/Business owner
+
+
4%
+
+
+
Content producer
+
2%
+
3%
+
+
+
DevOps
+
2%
+
2%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/my-company-has-remote-work-figured-out.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/my-company-has-remote-work-figured-out.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2a412e928
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/my-company-has-remote-work-figured-out.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "My company has remote work figured out") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
Percentage of Survey Participants
+
+
+
+
+
Strongly disagree
+
6%
+
+
+
Somewhat disagree
+
9%
+
+
+
Neither agree nor disagree
+
14%
+
+
+
Somewhat agree
+
32%
+
+
+
Strongly agree
+
39%
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/remote-changes.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/remote-changes.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4d812daa1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/remote-changes.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "Has your frequency of remote work changed in the last 12 months?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Frequency
+
Percentage of Survey Participants
+
+
+
+
+
Lots more in office
+
7%
+
+
+
Slightly more in office
+
16%
+
+
+
No changes
+
52%
+
+
+
Slighty more remote
+
9%
+
+
+
Lots more remote
+
15%
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/remote-frequency.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/remote-frequency.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e3ad238ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/remote-frequency.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h4', "What percentage of your time do you work remotely?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Frequency
+
Percentage of Survey Participants
+
+
+
+
+
0%
+
3%
+
+
+
1-9%
+
4%
+
+
+
10-24%
+
5%
+
+
+
25-49%
+
5%
+
+
+
50-74%
+
9%
+
+
+
75-89%
+
12%
+
+
+
90-99%
+
23%
+
+
+
100%
+
39%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/respondents-by-region.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/respondents-by-region.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..74ca67f4e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/respondents-by-region.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render("h5", "Respondents by region") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2021—2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
Employment Status
+
2021
+
2022
+
+
+
+
+
Europe
+
39%
+
33%
+
+
+
North America
+
31%
+
28%
+
+
+
All Asia
+
18%
+
19%
+
+
+
Asia Pacific
+
11%
+
12%
+
+
+
Africa
+
4%
+
8%
+
+
+
Southern Asia
+
6%
+
8%
+
+
+
South America
+
5%
+
5%
+
+
+
Eastern Asia
+
1%
+
2%
+
+
+
Middle East
+
1%
+
2%
+
+
+
Central America
+
1%
+
1%
+
+
+
Caribbean
+
1%
+
1%
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/what-influenced-leaving.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/what-influenced-leaving.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..94e15ccdd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/what-influenced-leaving.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h5', "Why did you leave your job?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
Not at all important
+
Slightly important
+
Moderately important
+
Very important
+
Extremely important
+
+
+
+
+
Remote work
+
6%
+
6%
+
18%
+
30%
+
41%
+
+
+
Career growth
+
3%
+
5%
+
18%
+
35%
+
39%
+
+
+
Company culture
+
4%
+
6%
+
21%
+
38%
+
31%
+
+
+
Team
+
4%
+
6%
+
21%
+
38%
+
31%
+
+
+
Money
+
4%
+
5%
+
20%
+
40%
+
30%
+
+
+
My manager
+
6%
+
9%
+
24%
+
34%
+
26%
+
+
+
Corporate ethics
+
6%
+
9%
+
25%
+
36%
+
25%
+
+
+
Technology choices
+
4%
+
7%
+
25%
+
42%
+
22%
+
+
+
Environmental impact
+
15%
+
16%
+
30%
+
25%
+
14%
+
+
+
Involuntary
+
36%
+
10%
+
28%
+
15%
+
11%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/what-influenced-staying.njk b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/what-influenced-staying.njk
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2e1377e18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/site/_includes/survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/what-influenced-staying.njk
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+
+
+
+ {{ permalinkHeading.render('h5', "Why did you stay in your job?") }}
+
Percentage of respondents
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Source: Jamstack Community Survey 2022
+
+
+ Show Chart Data
+
+
+
+
+
Not at all important
+
Slightly important
+
Moderately important
+
Very important
+
Extremely important
+
+
+
+
+
Team
+
3%
+
5%
+
19%
+
40%
+
34%
+
+
+
Remote work
+
5%
+
9%
+
22%
+
32%
+
32%
+
+
+
Career growth
+
3%
+
6%
+
21%
+
39%
+
31%
+
+
+
Company culture
+
4%
+
8%
+
21%
+
38%
+
29%
+
+
+
Money
+
3%
+
6%
+
25%
+
39%
+
28%
+
+
+
Corporate ethics
+
6%
+
9%
+
24%
+
37%
+
25%
+
+
+
My manager
+
6%
+
7%
+
24%
+
38%
+
24%
+
+
+
Technology choices
+
2%
+
7%
+
24%
+
44%
+
23%
+
+
+
Environmental impact
+
14%
+
16%
+
30%
+
26%
+
14%
+
+
+
Involuntary
+
31%
+
10%
+
34%
+
15%
+
10%
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/src/site/img/og/jamstack-community-survey-2022-og.png b/src/site/img/og/jamstack-community-survey-2022-og.png
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cd1064b1f
Binary files /dev/null and b/src/site/img/og/jamstack-community-survey-2022-og.png differ
diff --git a/src/site/survey/2021.njk b/src/site/survey/2021.njk
index 09df84104..f40a4367d 100644
--- a/src/site/survey/2021.njk
+++ b/src/site/survey/2021.njk
@@ -84,27 +84,27 @@ gradientColors:
Demographics
- {% include "survey/demographics.njk" %}
+ {% include "survey/2021/demographics.njk" %}
- {% include "survey/experience.njk" %}
+ {% include "survey/2021/experience.njk" %}
Jamstack adoption
- {% include "survey/adoption.njk" %}
+ {% include "survey/2021/adoption.njk" %}
Workflows
- {% include "survey/workflows.njk" %}
+ {% include "survey/2021/workflows.njk" %}
Technology choices
- {% include "survey/choices.njk" %}
+ {% include "survey/2021/choices.njk" %}
Jamstack has become the standard architecture for the web.
+ The third year of the Jamstack Community Survey found a mix of things we
+ expected – indeed, things we predicted last year – as well as some big
+ surprises about the many diverse members of our community. Some key
+ takeaways include:
+
+
+
+ Four out of five developers are now working remotely most of the time,
+ and more than half say they would quit their jobs rather than go back to
+ an office.
+
+
+ The number of people who have used serverless technology jumped to 70%,
+ taking it fully into the mainstream.
+
+
+ React continued to grow to an almost unprecedented 71% share of
+ developers, and Next.js rode that wave and is now used by 1 in every 2
+ developers.
+
+
+
+ Netlify sits at the
+ center of the Jamstack community, and we conduct our annual survey so we
+ can understand our community of developers. This helps us tailor our
+ products and services to our community. In sharing our survey results, we
+ also want to help developers better understand themselves and one another.
+ Working as a developer often means working in a vacuum, without a sense of
+ what’s happening in the broader community. Our survey data can help
+ provide a sense of best practices as well as an idea of what else is
+ happening in the community.
+
+
+ In addition to our usual framework census and our questions about content
+ management systems, this year we asked about some emerging technologies
+ that have received a lot of attention. The fuzzy group of technologies
+ called “Web3” garnered mixed feelings despite a great deal of press in
+ 2021 and 2022. Browser-native web components, on the other hand, seem to
+ have finally reached mainstream adoption.
+
+
+ As usual, our survey covers everyone we can reach: every kind of developer
+ responded to our survey from every region of the world, whether or not
+ they were Netlify users, and whether or not they considered themselves
+ Jamstack developers. Our survey this year received a little under 7,000
+ responses. If you’re interested in the specifics of our methodology, we
+ have a
+ detailed writeup
+ of the demographics and margins of error in our survey.
+
+
+ As usual, we want to thank the developers who took the time to contribute
+ to the survey. We have done our best to take the data you’ve given us and
+ turn it into useful, actionable insights for everyone in our community,
+ and we hope it helps you.
+
+
This year, our results are split into four sections:
+
+
+
+
+
+ {% include "survey/2022/whos-doing-the-building/index.njk" %}
+
+ {% include "survey/2022/what-are-we-building/index.njk" %}
+
+ {% include "survey/2022/how-are-we-building/index.njk" %}
+
+ {% include "survey/2022/where-are-we-going/index.njk" %}
+