Browse files

- added gettext to MODULES

- removed glib2 from LIB_DEPENDS since gtk+2 already depends on glib2
- added desktop-file-utils as a RUN_DEPENDS but need further
  clarification from jasper@ on what the other "related goo" is :)
  • Loading branch information...
1 parent 6d5fd95 commit 35ab4e47c7ca28b8229d484ed8791415c6691945 @lteo lteo committed Sep 8, 2011
Showing with 5 additions and 5 deletions.
  1. +5 −3 x11/parcellite/Makefile
  2. +0 −2 x11/parcellite/TODO
8 x11/parcellite/Makefile
@@ -30,10 +30,12 @@ CONFIGURE_ENV= CPPFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -I${LOCALBASE}/include" \
LIBS="`pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0`"
-MODULES= textproc/intltool
+MODULES= devel/gettext \
+ textproc/intltool
-LIB_DEPENDS= x11/gtk+2 \
- devel/glib2
+LIB_DEPENDS= x11/gtk+2
+RUN_DEPENDS= devel/desktop-file-utils
FAKE_FLAGS= autostartdir=${PREFIX}/share/examples/parcellite/xdg/autostart/
2 x11/parcellite/TODO
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
-Check if devel/glib2 LIB_DEPENDS is really necessary (feedback from David Coppa)
-Add gettext to MODULES (from Jasper)
Have manpage wrap properly (from Jasper)
"Also, this is lacking a run dependency on desktop-file-utils and the related goo." (from Jasper)
Investigate middle-click weirdness (from Landry -

3 comments on commit 35ab4e4


I assume the "goo" Jasper was talking about are those additional lines to be added in each PLIST with .desktop files:

@exec %D/bin/update-desktop-database
@unexec-delete %D/bin/update-desktop-database


yes sir.

every new porter goes through this rite of passage.


Thanks! Yes, Jasper confirmed via email that that's what he was referring to. :)

Please sign in to comment.