You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It mostly seemed like the original deck was just sorted by Kangxi number (something to possibly mention in the readme). However, I wanted to study the radicals by order of frequency so I added the radical frequency from the wikipedia article for kangxi radicals.
This was a bit cumbersome to do by hand, so I'm making a feature request to add a new field to all the cards populated with the frequency. I think ideally there would be kangxi and corpus frequency fields, but it's probably fine if it makes sense to only have one or the other.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It mostly seemed like the original deck was just sorted by Kangxi number (something to possibly mention in the readme). However, I wanted to study the radicals by order of frequency so I added the radical frequency from the wikipedia article for kangxi radicals.
This was a bit cumbersome to do by hand, so I'm making a feature request to add a new field to all the cards populated with the frequency. I think ideally there would be kangxi and corpus frequency fields, but it's probably fine if it makes sense to only have one or the other.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: