Use VersionAdmin.revision_manager rather than default_revision_manager #7

merged 4 commits into from Jun 20, 2012

2 participants


This change is to support using a non-default revision_manager on the CompareVersionAdmin. This is already support by the base VersionAdmin. Still needs some tests which I'm happy to write. Just wanted to get the discussion started to see if this seemed like a reasonable approach.


I use only the default revision_manager, so i didn't need this, yet. But if it work and the unittests didn't fail i would merge this.


Rebased to the latest master and added tests.

@jedie jedie merged commit af0b807 into jedie:master Jun 20, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment