Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Glynn as deployment option #5519

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2016
Merged

Conversation

neudabei
Copy link
Contributor

Remove Glynn as deployment option since that gem is no longer actively maintained. See notes in readme in repository: https://github.com/dmathieu/glynn and dmathieu/glynn#67

Remove Glynn as deployment option since that gem is no longer actively maintained. See notes on readme in repository: https://github.com/dmathieu/glynn and dmathieu/glynn#67
@DirtyF
Copy link
Member

DirtyF commented Oct 29, 2016

@neudabei 👍

/cc @jekyll/documentation

Copy link
Member

@parkr parkr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FTP... What a blast from the past! 😉

@neudabei
Copy link
Contributor Author

😉 Maybe it can be re-considered once the glynn project is maintained again for those who still want to use FTP or rather SFTP with jekyll.

@DirtyF
Copy link
Member

DirtyF commented Oct 30, 2016

@jekyllbot: merge +site

@jekyllbot jekyllbot merged commit 99d1272 into jekyll:master Oct 30, 2016
jekyllbot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2016
@Phlow
Copy link

Phlow commented Nov 15, 2016

Damn, that's sad. I use Glynn for small websites on my own webspace. It was so easy to use…

@neudabei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Phlow +1, I used it too and was very glad when I found it.

@jekyll jekyll locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 11, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants