New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Be more specific on what to upload #6119

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 4, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@DirtyF
Member

DirtyF commented Jun 4, 2017

@DirtyF DirtyF added the documentation label Jun 4, 2017

@DirtyF DirtyF assigned pathawks and unassigned pathawks Jun 4, 2017

@DirtyF DirtyF requested a review from pathawks Jun 4, 2017

@DirtyF

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@DirtyF

DirtyF Jun 4, 2017

Member

@jekyllbot: merge +docs

Member

DirtyF commented Jun 4, 2017

@jekyllbot: merge +docs

@jekyllbot jekyllbot merged commit 4b7ebeb into master Jun 4, 2017

2 checks passed

continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details

@jekyllbot jekyllbot deleted the 6118-docs-upload-content branch Jun 4, 2017

jekyllbot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2017

@pathawks

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pathawks

pathawks Jun 4, 2017

Member

Thank you @mittalyashu for bringing this up, and @DirtyF for getting it fixed 🍻👍

Member

pathawks commented Jun 4, 2017

Thank you @mittalyashu for bringing this up, and @DirtyF for getting it fixed 🍻👍

@mittalyashu

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mittalyashu

mittalyashu Jun 5, 2017

Contributor

Big FAN of Jekyll. Love to contribute more.

Contributor

mittalyashu commented Jun 5, 2017

Big FAN of Jekyll. Love to contribute more.

@mittalyashu

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mittalyashu

mittalyashu Jun 5, 2017

Contributor

Yes. Now it is more specific. 👍

Contributor

mittalyashu commented on cfde8b8 Jun 5, 2017

Yes. Now it is more specific. 👍

@huangxianfeng

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment

good

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment