Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate TravisCI jobs to GitHub Actions #8492

Merged
merged 16 commits into from Dec 4, 2020

Conversation

ashmaroli
Copy link
Member

@ashmaroli ashmaroli commented Dec 2, 2020

Background

Because TravisCI.org is shutting down, its web workers are being retired gradually and consequently jobs take ages to get queued and then run.
Migrating to TravisCI.com is an option but it is not entirely free even for FOSS projects — builds consume finite amount of minutes allotted per month.

Summary

Use GH Actions to handle CI for Linux platform by running Jekyll's test suite on Rubies 2.5 and 2.7
Once everything is running as expected, TravisCI will only be running tests on JRuby and RuboCop-based script.

  • Remove .travis.yml entirely
  • Modify workflows/ci.yml
  • Remove redundant badges from README document

@DirtyF
Copy link
Member

DirtyF commented Dec 2, 2020

Great move, happy to have all tests under one roof.

About Open Source on Travis:

Also, we are fast approaching the end of a lengthy migration process from travis-ci.org to travis-ci.com, which was initially announced in 2018. This migration enables all accounts - including open source - to receive the benefits of new features and infrastructure improvements under a single platform. Open source accounts, as always, will be completely free under travis-ci.com.

@ashmaroli
Copy link
Member Author

The following is from TravisCI Community Forum:
https://travis-ci.community/t/org-com-migration-unexpectedly-comes-with-a-plan-change-for-oss-what-exactly-is-the-new-deal/10567/7

We will be offering an allotment of OSS minutes that will be reviewed and allocated on a case by case basis. Should you want to apply for these credits please open a request with Travis CI support stating that you’d like to be considered for the OSS allotment. Please include: Your account name and VCS provider (like travis-ci.com/github/[your account name] ) How many credits (build minutes) you’d like to request (should your run out of credits again you can repeat the process to…

@ashmaroli ashmaroli changed the title Migrate part of TravisCI jobs to GitHub Actions Migrate TravisCI jobs to GitHub Actions Dec 2, 2020
@ashmaroli ashmaroli added the tests label Dec 2, 2020
@ashmaroli ashmaroli marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2020 17:15
@ashmaroli ashmaroli requested a review from DirtyF December 2, 2020 17:15
@DirtyF DirtyF added the internal label Dec 4, 2020
Copy link
Member

@DirtyF DirtyF left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome!

@DirtyF
Copy link
Member

DirtyF commented Dec 4, 2020

@jekyllbot: merge +dev

@jekyllbot jekyllbot merged commit 91aed9f into jekyll:master Dec 4, 2020
@jekyllbot jekyllbot added the fix label Dec 4, 2020
jekyllbot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2020
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2020
Ashwin Maroli: Migrate TravisCI jobs to GitHub Actions (#8492)

Merge pull request 8492
github-actions bot pushed a commit to tigefa4u/jekyll that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2020
jekyllbot: Update history to reflect merge of jekyll#8492 [ci skip]
github-actions bot pushed a commit to patilswapnilv/jekyll that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2020
jekyllbot: Update history to reflect merge of jekyll#8492 [ci skip]
github-actions bot pushed a commit to chauncey-garrett/jekyll that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2020
jekyllbot: Update history to reflect merge of jekyll#8492 [ci skip]
@jekyll jekyll locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 4, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants