Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JENKINS-12134] Only fingerprint if source does. #8

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jorgenpt
Copy link
Contributor

This only fingerprints if the source project has "fingerprint all archived
artifacts" enabled. This also adds tests for this behavior.

Creating a pull request to get some more eyes on this before I push it to master.

This only fingerprints if the source project has "fingerprint all archived
artifacts" enabled. This also adds tests for this behavior.
@kohsuke
Copy link
Member

kohsuke commented Jan 12, 2012

I've released 1.21 with better implementation of this that hopefully hides the overhead. Keeping this pull request open in case he still complains, but we shouldn't merge this until that's confirmed.

@jorgenpt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi <
reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

I've released 1.21 with better implementation of this that hopefully hides
the overhead. Keeping this pull request open in case he still complains,
but we shouldn't merge this until that's confirmed.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

#8 (comment)

@mandeepr
Copy link

I would still like to make it optional, as with a large number of small artifacts, the fingerprinting process takes much longer than the actual IO, even after 1.21

@alanharder
Copy link
Member

+1 to skipping fingerprint if neither source nor destination project use fingerprinting at all.

@alanharder
Copy link
Member

any update on this? should this request be closed or added?

@mandeepr
Copy link

+1 to adding this still

@ringods
Copy link

ringods commented Mar 21, 2012

+1 to make fingerprinting optional. Fingerprinting is overhead for our build process.

@nanonyme
Copy link
Member

Sounds good to me. If the optionality is per artifacted file, this is exactly like I'd expect copy artifacts to work. Ie you can copy many files in one copy artifacts request, some of them are fingerprinted, some are not.

@nanonyme
Copy link
Member

nanonyme commented Jan 9, 2013

Btw, #11 also implements this functionality. Could you please work with the author of the other pull request decide which of these makes more sense and have that one reviewed and the other one closed?

@jenkinsadmin
Copy link
Member

Thank you for a pull request! Please check this document for how the Jenkins project handles pull requests

@daniel-beck
Copy link
Member

Given that #11 was merged, this can probably be closed.

@sam-spain
Copy link

Can this be closed now?

@MarkEWaite
Copy link
Contributor

Closing

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite closed this Jan 22, 2023
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite deleted the dont-fingerprint-if-source-doesnt branch January 22, 2023 21:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
10 participants