-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The jnlp container in each slave consumes about 200M memories #721
Comments
200M is an expected consumption if Java starts with the default options. You can tweak Java options and try to decrease the memory footprint, but I am not sure it's possible to achieve much difference |
Thanks for the suggestion. The jnlp container is started by jenkins-kubernetes plugin by default, and how can I tweak the java options for this container instead of other affect the other working containers in a slave? |
It makes sense to as Kubernetes maintainers. @carlossg fyi |
You can see how to customize it at https://github.com/jenkinsci/kubernetes-plugin#pipeline-support |
Fixed Jenkins UID and GID to be consistent with the Jenkins Docker image
We used the jenkins-kubernetes plugin to set up a test framework, and we found that the jnlp-container in each jenkins slave consumes about 200M memories. Is it normal or there is something wrong?
Is there any way to constrain the memory consumption? Will such limit affects the performance?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: