Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

These two operations do not actually need the local repository cache #544

merged 1 commit into from Oct 20, 2017


None yet
3 participants
Copy link

commented Oct 19, 2017


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Oct 19, 2017

This pull request originates from a CloudBees employee. At CloudBees, we require that all pull requests be reviewed by other CloudBees employees before we seek to have the change accepted. If you want to learn more about our process please see this explanation.


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

commented Oct 19, 2017

Retriggering, failure due to maven repository resolution issue on some build nodes

@stephenc stephenc closed this Oct 19, 2017

@stephenc stephenc reopened this Oct 19, 2017

Copy link

left a comment

Looks good at the code review level. Also completed interactive testing before release.

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite merged commit 37fe9a0 into jenkinsci:master Oct 20, 2017

1 check passed

continuous-integration/jenkins/pr-merge This commit looks good

@stephenc stephenc deleted the stephenc:avoid-local-cache branch Oct 21, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.