You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[JENKINS-35452] Change Jnlp url from "slave-agent.jnlp" to "agent.jnlp" #17229
The name of this file should match agreed naming guidelines - "agent.jnlp" or "jenkins-agent.jnlp".
The originally agreement was that the term slave would be removed from the UI, but left in the APIs to avoid breaking compatibility both for plugins and customer tools/scripts. The problem is that line of where the UI stops and the API begins is a somewhat fluid when your users are engineers.
I understand that filenames and urls are effectively part of the API and so changing them is problematic and could be considered out of scope. But filenames and urls are also part of the end-user experience (the UI) for every Jenkins user. And the files and urls related to adding an agent are some of the first and most commonly used.
The name of this file should match agreed naming guidelines - "agent.jnlp" or "jenkins-agent.jnlp".
The originally agreement was that the term slave would be removed from the UI, but left in the APIs to avoid breaking compatibility both for plugins and customer tools/scripts. The problem is that line of where the UI stops and the API begins is a somewhat fluid when your users are engineers.
I understand that filenames and urls are effectively part of the API and so changing them is problematic and could be considered out of scope. But filenames and urls are also part of the end-user experience (the UI) for every Jenkins user. And the files and urls related to adding an agent are some of the first and most commonly used.
Not a bug.
As a remoting maintainer I do not plan to work on it. The people responsible for the slave=>agent renaming decision implementation should drive it
Not a bug.
As a remoting maintainer I do not plan to work on it. The people responsible for the slave=>agent renaming decision implementation should drive it
Activity
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Feb 28, 2017
Raw content of original comment:
Not a bug.
As a remoting maintainer I do not plan to work on it. The people responsible for the slave=>agent renaming decision implementation should drive it
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Dec 20, 2017
Raw content of original comment:
oleg_nenashev the places to be changed would be found by this query, am I correct?
https://github.com/jenkinsci/remoting/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=slave&type=
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Oct 27, 2020
Raw content of original comment:
The fix has been released in Jenkins 2.264 . I will tag it as lts candidate so that we consider backporting to 2.263.1
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Nov 20, 2020
Raw content of original comment:
Not including into 2.263.1 as the fix is pending polishing. #5062 (comment)
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Nov 24, 2025
[Original
relates_tofrom Jira: JENKINS-31095]jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Nov 24, 2025
[Original
relates_tofrom Jira: JENKINS-35449]jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Nov 24, 2025
[Original
relates_tofrom Jira: JENKINS-35451]