Pick-up parent pom 1.41 adding junit to dependencyManagement

[batmat]

Pick up jenkinsci/pom#19 which basically only adds junit to dependencyManagement.

Full diff: https://github.com/jenkinsci/pom/compare/jenkins-1.40...jenkins-1.41?expand=1

No JIRA issue since this is a very small internal change and only touches the test code.

Proposed changelog entries

• Internal:: N/A (only changes test framework)

Submitter checklist

• JIRA issue is well described
• Changelog entry appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developer, depending on the change). Examples
  * Use the Internal: prefix if the change has no user-visible impact (API, test frameworks, etc.)
• Appropriate autotests or explanation to why this change has no tests
• For dependency updates: links to external changelogs and, if possible, full diffs

Desired reviewers

@reviewbybees esp. @oleg-nenashev

[batmat]

FTR, filing this because I would like to pick up the 1.42 also soon, so I preferred to serialize changes so that we can possibly bisect things if something goes wrong.

[oleg-nenashev]

I would just go forward and pick 1.42.
Maven Site is not a critical functionality.

P.S. Apparently something does not work in the builder

[oleg-nenashev]

You need to just remove the entire section IIUC

[batmat]

@oleg-nenashev not sure I get what you mean, removing the whole dependencyManagement section?

If so, then either I'm missing something, or I disagree: this would be out of scope for this change, and there are 10+ other dependencies declared there. So it would look like much more involved/risky. Some things like the servlet-api override are not even declared in the parent pom, so really I must be missing your point.

[oleg-nenashev]

Just for junit, of course. The rest could be eventually removed as well (or moved to BOM), but this is a separate story

[oleg-nenashev]

dependencyManagement section for junit needs to be removed entirely

[batmat]

@oleg-nenashev fixed.

[batmat]

Will merge it later today if nobody objects. Thanks for the review!

[oleg-nenashev]

@reviewbybees done