Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modernise the appearance of the plugin manager #5916

Merged
merged 45 commits into from Dec 14, 2021

Conversation

janfaracik
Copy link
Contributor

@janfaracik janfaracik commented Nov 12, 2021

📸 Screenshots image Screenshot 2021-11-12 at 19 29 22


image Screenshot 2021-11-12 at 19 34 23


image Screenshot 2021-11-12 at 19 29 56


image Screenshot 2021-11-12 at 19 30 02

Proposed changelog entries

  • Modernise the appearance of the plugin manager

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

  • (If applicable) Jira issue is well described
  • Changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developer, depending on the change). Examples
    • Fill-in the Proposed changelog entries section only if there are breaking changes or other changes which may require extra steps from users during the upgrade
  • Appropriate autotests or explanation to why this change has no tests
  • For dependency updates: links to external changelogs and, if possible, full diffs

Desired reviewers

@mention

Maintainer checklist

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

  • There are at least 2 approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change
  • Conversations in the pull request are over OR it is explicit that a reviewer does not block the change
  • Changelog entries in the PR title and/or Proposed changelog entries are correct
  • Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically
  • If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the PR title. (example)
  • If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).

@janfaracik janfaracik changed the title draft: Modernise the appearance of the plugin manager Modernise the appearance of the plugin manager Nov 12, 2021
@janfaracik janfaracik marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2021 19:47
@janfaracik
Copy link
Contributor Author

⬇️ Discussion around this would be good ⬇️
I've added an .editorconfig file to ensure consistency in frontend files going forward, would be good to discuss this to see if theres a demand for this/any issues with it :)

Copy link
Member

@timja timja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bom testing has passed: jenkinsci/bom#756

ATH was tested in jenkinsci/acceptance-test-harness#716.

and issues are resolved in jenkinsci/acceptance-test-harness#718

I think we're ready to ship this.

Thanks!

@timja timja requested review from fqueiruga, uhafner and a team December 12, 2021 15:48
Copy link
Member

@jetersen jetersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding an editorconfig is great, but please add the root = true, so that editor will stop traversing all directories.

.editorconfig Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Joseph Petersen <josephp90@gmail.com>
@timja timja requested a review from jetersen December 12, 2021 16:24
@jetersen
Copy link
Member

@timja I have no further input. I do not think I can approve the frontend part of it 😅 At least it is looking great, so keep up the good work!

@timja timja removed the request for review from jetersen December 12, 2021 17:04
Copy link
Member

@uhafner uhafner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, not much has changed since my last review. The new UI looks much better in most places. I think the deprecated banners are still too close to the text, but that was a problem before.

One thing that I really don't like is the position of the search bar. It is far too wide in the upper right corner (where it looks unrelated) and a lot of users will not find them when opening the new page the first time. It already is not ideal in the current UI (where it is above the tabs rather than right above the table), but now I think the usability is getting worse.

Bildschirmfoto 2021-12-12 um 23 06 01

But anyway, we can improve that in followup PRs.

@timja timja added the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label Dec 13, 2021
@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented Dec 13, 2021

This PR is now ready for merge, after ~24 hours, we will merge it if there's no negative feedback.

Thanks!

@timja timja merged commit 3dcabc4 into jenkinsci:master Dec 14, 2021
@uhafner
Copy link
Member

uhafner commented Dec 14, 2021

I created a followup Jira so the remaining review comments will not be forgotten: https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67366.

@janfaracik
Copy link
Contributor Author

I created a followup Jira so the remaining review comments will not be forgotten: https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67366.

Awesome! I've got a follow up branch in the works to address a lot of your comments - thanks :)

@janfaracik janfaracik deleted the update-plugin-manager branch January 5, 2022 15:09
@Bananeweizen
Copy link
Contributor

The downgrade buttons are not aligned. Their position depends on the text width of the version number.
image

@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented Jan 6, 2022

can you create an issue on https://issues.jenkins.io component core please and link here?

so that someone can take a look when they have time

@basil
Copy link
Member

basil commented Apr 15, 2022

@janfaracik Causes JENKINS-68277.

@basil
Copy link
Member

basil commented Apr 20, 2022

Causes JENKINS-68291.

@daniel-beck
Copy link
Member

What's the purpose of editorconfig when the most important JS file in the project isn't following this to begin with? I currently have to fight against editorconfig on every single line I edit in hudson-behavior.js unless I want mixed-width indentation in the file.

@timja timja mentioned this pull request Jul 16, 2022
@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented Jul 16, 2022

What's the purpose of editorconfig when the most important JS file in the project isn't following this to begin with? I currently have to fight against editorconfig on every single line I edit in hudson-behavior.js unless I want mixed-width indentation in the file.

Filed #6863

@daniel-beck
Copy link
Member

This editorconfig continues to be incredibly annoying, since not all Jelly files are currently indented using 2 spaces.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted web-ui The PR includes WebUI changes which may need special expertise
Projects
None yet
8 participants