Permalink
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Browse files
[JENKINS-43507] Fix spelling mistakes
- Loading branch information
|
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ |
|
|
* <li>All methods should be either {@code final} or {@code abstract} unless there is a documented reason for |
|
|
* allowing overrides</li> |
|
|
* <li>All "setter" methods will return {@link B} and be called "withXxx"</li> |
|
|
* <li>All "getter" methods will called "xxx()" callers should not assume that the returned value is resistent |
|
|
* from concurrent changes but implementations should ensure that the returned value is immutable by the caller. |
|
|
* In other words, it is intentional to reduce intermediate allocations by |
|
|
* <li>All "getter" methods will be called "xxx()". Callers should not assume that the returned value is resistant |
|
|
* from concurrent changes. Implementations should ensure that the returned value is immutable by the caller. |
|
|
* In other words, it is intentional for implementations to reduce intermediate allocations by |
|
|
* {@code return Collections.unmodifiableList(theList);} rather than the concurrency safe |
|
|
* {@code return Collections.unmodifiableList(new ArrayList<>(theList));} |
|
|
* </li> |
|
|
|
@@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ |
|
|
* <li>All methods should be either {@code final} or {@code abstract} unless there is a documented reason for |
|
|
* allowing overrides</li> |
|
|
* <li>All "setter" methods will return {@link C} and be called "withXxx"</li> |
|
|
* <li>All "getter" methods will called "xxx()" callers should not assume that the returned value is resistent |
|
|
* from concurrent changes but implementations should ensure that the returned value is immutable by the caller. |
|
|
* In other words, it is intentional to reduce intermediate allocations by |
|
|
* <li>All "getter" methods will be called "xxx()". Callers should not assume that the returned value is resistant |
|
|
* from concurrent changes. Implementations should ensure that the returned value is immutable by the caller. |
|
|
* In other words, it is intentional for implementations to reduce intermediate allocations by |
|
|
* {@code return Collections.unmodifiableList(theList);} rather than the concurrency safe |
|
|
* {@code return Collections.unmodifiableList(new ArrayList<>(theList));} |
|
|
* </li> |
|
|
|
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ |
|
|
* <li>All methods should be either {@code final} or {@code abstract} unless there is a documented reason for |
|
|
* allowing overrides</li> |
|
|
* <li>All "setter" methods will return {@link B} and be called "withXxx"</li> |
|
|
* <li>All "getter" methods will called "xxx()" callers should not assume that the returned value is resistent |
|
|
* from concurrent changes but implementations should ensure that the returned value is immutable by the caller. |
|
|
* In other words, it is intentional to reduce intermediate allocations by |
|
|
* <li>All "getter" methods will be called "xxx()". Callers should not assume that the returned value is resistant |
|
|
* from concurrent changes. Implementations should ensure that the returned value is immutable by the caller. |
|
|
* In other words, it is intentional for implementations to reduce intermediate allocations by |
|
|
* {@code return Collections.unmodifiableList(theList);} rather than the concurrency safe |
|
|
* {@code return Collections.unmodifiableList(new ArrayList<>(theList));} |
|
|
* </li> |
|
|
|
@@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ |
|
|
* <li>All methods should be either {@code final} or {@code abstract} unless there is a documented reason for |
|
|
* allowing overrides</li> |
|
|
* <li>All "setter" methods will return {@link C} and be called "withXxx"</li> |
|
|
* <li>All "getter" methods will called "xxx()" callers should not assume that the returned value is resistent |
|
|
* from concurrent changes but implementations should ensure that the returned value is immutable by the caller. |
|
|
* In other words, it is intentional to reduce intermediate allocations by |
|
|
* <li>All "getter" methods will be called "xxx()". Callers should not assume that the returned value is resistant |
|
|
* from concurrent changes. Implementations should ensure that the returned value is immutable by the caller. |
|
|
* In other words, it is intentional for implementations to reduce intermediate allocations by |
|
|
* {@code return Collections.unmodifiableList(theList);} rather than the concurrency safe |
|
|
* {@code return Collections.unmodifiableList(new ArrayList<>(theList));} |
|
|
* </li> |
|
|