Repository navigation
[JENKINS-36013] Automatically abort ExecutorPickle rehydration from an ephemeral node #497
Description
ExecutorPickle.rehydrate ought to be able to detect that it has been spinning in circles because the agent node it was supposed to run on is not in the Jenkins node list, and automatically abort, causing the build to fail with a comprehensible message rather than just hanging indefinitely. (As opposed to being registered but offline, which is normal enough for a JNLP agent etc.—in such cases we just want to wait for the agent to come back online.)
This would provide a better experience for the case of a build which was running on an EphemeralNode (such as from a Cloud without durable-task integration) when Jenkins was restarted. An agent using an inappropriate RetentionStrategy is trickier since it might still be defined after a restart, but will soon be terminated. Similarly, there may be cases where the agent is actually going to be redefined (with the same name) when it is attached after the restart—not sure about the Swarm plugin, but CloudBees DEV@cloud OPEs work this way. To prevent the build from being killed too aggressively, the cleanup should be delayed until some time has elapsed since rehydration began (or, ideally, since Jenkins completed initialization)—say, five minutes.
Originally reported by
jglick, imported from: Automatically abort ExecutorPickle rehydration from an ephemeral node
- assignee: svanoort
- status: Closed
- priority: Critical
- component(s): workflow-durable-task-step-plugin
- label(s): cloudbees-internal-pipeline, robustness
- resolution: Fixed
- resolved: 2017-08-23T22:22:39+00:00
- votes: 6
- watchers: 11
- imported: 20251212-090250
Raw content of original issue
ExecutorPickle.rehydrate ought to be able to detect that it has been spinning in circles because the agent node it was supposed to run on is not in the Jenkins node list, and automatically abort, causing the build to fail with a comprehensible message rather than just hanging indefinitely. (As opposed to being registered but offline, which is normal enough for a JNLP agent etc.—in such cases we just want to wait for the agent to come back online.)
This would provide a better experience for the case of a build which was running on an EphemeralNode (such as from a Cloud without durable-task integration) when Jenkins was restarted. An agent using an inappropriate RetentionStrategy is trickier since it might still be defined after a restart, but will soon be terminated. Similarly, there may be cases where the agent is actually going to be redefined (with the same name) when it is attached after the restart—not sure about the Swarm plugin, but CloudBees DEV@cloud OPEs work this way. To prevent the build from being killed too aggressively, the cleanup should be delayed until some time has elapsed since rehydration began (or, ideally, since Jenkins completed initialization)—say, five minutes.
Activity
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Jun 16, 2016
Remote links associated with this issue:
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Jun 16, 2016
Raw content of original comment:
Originally suggested in JENKINS-26130">
JENKINS-26130but I felt it was better to split this out. JENKINS-26130">JENKINS-26130does at least provide a much more comprehensible diagnosis for the problem.jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Jan 31, 2017
Raw content of original comment:
Sounds related to what rtyler is experiencing with JENKINS-41569">
JENKINS-41569.jenkins-infra-bot commentedon May 12, 2017
Raw content of original comment:
FWIW, I am experiencing the same issue with the mesos cloud provider.
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Jul 26, 2017
Raw content of original comment:
jglick did you have any WIP on this or is someone free to take a run at this? as it is biting a few people people now (not mentioned on this ticket)
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Jul 27, 2017
Raw content of original comment:
I had nothing in progress; up for grabs. The tricky bit is identifying the case you are running under reliably. If you are actually dealing with an EphemeralNode, probably the ExecutorPickle could record that fact and fail promptly upon rehydration. The harder cases are nodes that get reattached by some outside process sometime after start—you need to give them a grace period.
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Jul 28, 2017
Raw content of original comment:
thanks jglick yes on a hangout that conclusion was made to - to have some grace period for things that happen outside, that should be fine.
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Aug 7, 2017
svanoort:
Raw content of original comment:
I have a testcase that reproduces the issue and a code fix kills the build. Working on adding the timeout to that solution, and looking at ways to limit the scope of builds that are killed to avoid it getting overeager.
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Aug 16, 2017
Raw content of original comment:
nice svanoort!
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Aug 17, 2017
svanoort:
Raw content of original comment:
FYI I've cut beta 2.14-beta to try out of this if people want try it
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Aug 17, 2017
svanoort:
Raw content of original comment:
On second thought, hold on, I'm going to cut a different one.
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Aug 23, 2017
svanoort:
Raw content of original comment:
Fix released with durable task step 2.14
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Aug 26, 2017
basil:
Raw content of original comment:
After upgrading from 2.13 to 2.14, my pipeline jobs that use the swarm plugin can't survive a restart anymore.
Under 2.13, my pipeline jobs were able to survive a restart if I used the -deleteExistingClients option that the swarm plugin has. Without -deleteExistingClients, I used to get this:
But this was basically working once I added -deleteExistingClients:
Now, after upgrading to 2.14, this doesn't work at all:
Since I rely on the swarm plugin in my pipeline jobs, I view this as a major regression. It would be nice to have this functionality restored.
Also note that I'm using the latest version of the swarm plugin and swarm client (3.4 on both ends).
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Aug 26, 2017
svanoort:
Raw content of original comment:
basil I am sorry to hear that this caused a regression for you – it appears to be an unanticipated case where EphemeralNodes generated by the Swarm Plugin aren't really following the contract of that interface, since they can reconnect and be recreated but will not do so immediately.
I have a fix supplied here – #48 – pending review by jglick. This will apply a 5 minute timeout, restoring my original implementation strategy.
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Aug 26, 2017
Raw content of original comment:
basil sounds like a bug in the Swarm plugin to me. The implementation of JENKINS-34593">
JENKINS-34593ought to have removed the EphemeralNode marker if I understand it correctly. The description of -deleteExistingClients does not seem to talk about retaining agents across restarts but it seems that you have discovered that as a use case—probably not a tested one. (As an aside, it seems the plugin contains no tests which actually run Jenkins, much less tests of Pipeline interoperability or of restart behavior.)jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Sep 9, 2017
basil:
Raw content of original comment:
svanoort and jglick, I wanted to say thank you for releasing version 2.15 which restores this functionality. I tested it, and my pipeline jobs that use the swarm plugin once again survive Jenkins restarts. Thanks!
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Sep 11, 2017
Raw content of original comment:
hi five svanoort (but make sure he has washed his hands, he just finished coming second in a chilli eating competition)!
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Sep 14, 2017
svanoort:
Raw content of original comment:
basil Thanks! I'm glad you're finding it works well for you now
jenkins-infra-bot commentedon Dec 12, 2025
[Original
depends_onfrom Jira: JENKINS-26130]