Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] add support for exclusive states [sf#3] #138

Closed
lsf37 opened this issue Feb 15, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

[Feature] add support for exclusive states [sf#3] #138

lsf37 opened this issue Feb 15, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@lsf37
Copy link
Member

@lsf37 lsf37 commented Feb 15, 2015

Reported by beroset on 2001-09-06 23:12 UTC
JFlex %state keyword only implements inclusive states, but sometimes exclusive states are required for the job.

@lsf37 lsf37 changed the title add support for exclusive states [Feature] add support for exclusive states [sf#3] Feb 15, 2015
@lsf37 lsf37 closed this Feb 15, 2015
@lsf37
Copy link
Member Author

@lsf37 lsf37 commented Feb 15, 2015

Updated by lsf37 on 2001-09-17 11:18 UTC

  • labels: --> specification language
  • assigned_to: nobody --> lsf37
@lsf37
Copy link
Member Author

@lsf37 lsf37 commented Feb 15, 2015

Commented by lsf37 on 2001-09-21 21:53 UTC
Logged In: YES
user_id=93534

I'll propably implement it in the next major version. Do you
have any special situation where you need exclusive states?

@lsf37
Copy link
Member Author

@lsf37 lsf37 commented Feb 15, 2015

Commented by beroset on 2001-09-22 01:17 UTC
Logged In: YES
user_id=318066

The specific application I'm working with is intended to
convert a text file in a specific format to an XML file.
The reason I need exclusive states is that the formats for
the sections of the source text file are completely
different. This thing started out as a C++ application and
except for this one thing, I've had no difficulty porting
using JFlex. I'm not expert in Java yet, but let me know
if I can help.

@lsf37
Copy link
Member Author

@lsf37 lsf37 commented Feb 15, 2015

Commented by lsf37 on 2001-10-01 10:53 UTC
Logged In: YES
user_id=93534

implemented in version 1.3.4

@lsf37
Copy link
Member Author

@lsf37 lsf37 commented Feb 15, 2015

Updated by lsf37 on 2001-10-01 10:53 UTC

  • status: open --> closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant
You can’t perform that action at this time.