Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] Definitions not checked in complement [sf#48] #50

Closed
lsf37 opened this issue Feb 15, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

[Bug] Definitions not checked in complement [sf#48] #50

lsf37 opened this issue Feb 15, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Not working as intended

Comments

@lsf37
Copy link
Member

lsf37 commented Feb 15, 2015

*Reported by anonymous on 2001-12-10 11:09 UTC
When referring to an undeclared definition in a
complement expression no error is reported:

%%

r = !{s}

%%

will be accepted, but a NullPointerException is thrown
when the dfa is constructed as `s' is not defined.

@lsf37 lsf37 changed the title Definitions not checked in complement [Bug] Definitions not checked in complement [sf#48] Feb 15, 2015
@lsf37 lsf37 added this to the jflex bug milestone Feb 15, 2015
@lsf37 lsf37 closed this as completed Feb 15, 2015
@lsf37
Copy link
Member Author

lsf37 commented Feb 15, 2015

Commented by lsf37 on 2001-12-12 17:47 UTC
Logged In: YES
user_id=93534

I've reproduced the bug; macros containing complement or
upto are not checked for definedness before NFA
construction.

The bug will be fixed in the next release.

@lsf37
Copy link
Member Author

lsf37 commented Feb 15, 2015

Updated by lsf37 on 2001-12-12 17:47 UTC

  • status: open --> open-accepted

@lsf37
Copy link
Member Author

lsf37 commented Feb 15, 2015

Updated by lsf37 on 2004-04-12 12:26 UTC

  • status: open-accepted --> closed

@lsf37 lsf37 added the bug Not working as intended label Feb 17, 2015
@lsf37 lsf37 modified the milestone: jflex bug Feb 17, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Not working as intended
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant