normalise char class order before NFA construction #650
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is to make generated automata more easily comparable, in particular to make them more obviously equal when they are isomorphic up to input renaming.
|
Codacy doesn't like the explicit |
|
This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 2c2c0bd into 170197a - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is to make generated automata more easily comparable, in particular to make
them more obviously equal when they are isomorphic up to input renaming.
Will hopefully make the upcoming char class refactoring more robust to test.