Analyse citation data from Google Scholar
R Makefile
Clone or download
guangchuang yu
guangchuang yu update data
Latest commit 1baedf2 Jul 3, 2018


The scholar R package provides functions to extract citation data from Google Scholar. In addition to retrieving basic information about a single scholar, the package also allows you to compare multiple scholars and predict future h-index values.

Development of the scholar package has resumed and a new maintainer should be confirmed shortly. Please continue to file issues and make pull requests against going forwards.

Basic features

Individual scholars are referenced by a unique character string, which can be found by searching for an author and inspecting the resulting scholar homepage. For example, the profile of physicist Richard Feynman is located at and so his unique id is B7vSqZsAAAAJ.

Basic information on a scholar can be retrieved as follows:

# Define the id for Richard Feynman
id <- 'B7vSqZsAAAAJ'

# Get his profile and print his name
l <- get_profile(id)

# Get his citation history, i.e. citations to his work in a given year 

# Get his publications (a large data frame)

Additional functions allow the user to query the publications list, e.g. get_num_articles, get_num_distinct_journals, get_oldest_article, get_num_top_journals. Note that Google doesn't explicit categorize publications as journal articles, book chapters, etc, and so journal or article in these function names is just a generic term for a publication.

Comparing scholars

You can also compare multiple scholars, as shown below. Note that these two particular scholars are rather profilic and these queries will take a very long time to run.

# Compare Feynman and Stephen Hawking
ids <- c('B7vSqZsAAAAJ', 'qj74uXkAAAAJ')

# Get a data frame comparing the number of citations to their work in
# a given year 

# Compare their career trajectories, based on year of first citation

Predicting future h-index values

Finally users can predict the future h-index of a scholar, based on the method of Acuna et al.. Since the method was originally calibrated on data from neuroscientists, it goes without saying that, if the scholar is from another discipline, then the results should be taken with a large pinch of salt. A more general critique of the original paper is available here. Still, it's a bit of fun.

## Predict h-index of original method author, Daniel Acuna
id <- 'GAi23ssAAAAJ'