armhf version

[Fancyfips]

Is there a possibility to run the docker-handbrake container on a armv7 (Rasp-pi 3B+, Raspian streech) or is it possible to provide a armhf version of this container?

Kernel Version: 4.14.79-v7+
Operating System: Raspbian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch)
OSType: linux
Architecture: armv7l

docker version
Client:
Version: 18.09.1
API version: 1.39
Go version: go1.10.6
Git commit: 4c52b90
Built: Wed Jan 9 19:42:45 2019
OS/Arch: linux/arm
Experimental: false

Server: Docker Engine - Community
Engine:
Version: 18.09.1
API version: 1.39 (minimum version 1.12)
Go version: go1.10.6
Git commit: 4c52b90
Built: Wed Jan 9 19:04:13 2019
OS/Arch: linux/arm
Experimental: true

[jlesage]

Currently the image doesn't support armhf.
However, it may be possible to add support for more platforms in the future.

[tristan-k]

Will there be support in the near future?

[jlesage]

Yes, this is something I plan to do.

[AlimFreight]

Yes, this is something I plan to do.

Thank you very much! So many people waiting for that moment!

[fgordon-maker]

Upvote for armhf support! Thank you!

[githubscrub]

This would be huge, would love to see ARM supported!

[manualbashing]

Same here! It would be great to be able to use this image on a rasp-pi.

[SamuraiCoder]

Any plans for this? I would love to see it! thanks!

[gabrielwhite]

Likewise!

[jkossis]

This would be awesome indeed!

[colin-gourlay]

+1

[stuart264]

Would love this, would make my life so much easier

[mitchharvey]

Any updates? @jlesage

[rastacalavera]

Throwing my hat in the ring for arm64. doing this on my pi4 would be great

[REMINJOSE]

please update for arm4

[phankins11]

+1 from me for an arm64 version

Yes, this is something I plan to do.

@jlesage in the mean time would you be willing to share with me some specifics about your baseimage-gui image so I can attempt to build out a version of this baseimage-gui for myself to run on my RPi4.

[akhilleusuggo]

any update ?

[b3ni]

+1

[jlesage]

Just to let you know that I'm still working on this. Implementing a Docker baseimage that supports multiple architectures/distros and that can be automatically be built and tested on public services is not easy and takes a lot of time. For example, a lot of components of the image need to be cross-compiled, which is more complex to achieve than just compiling the same piece of software under QEMU. But compiling under QEMU is not an option, since doing this on public services (like Github Actions) is way too slow (several hours and hitting the run time limit of the service).

[phankins11]

Just to let you know that I'm still working on this. Implementing a Docker baseimage that supports multiple architectures/distros and that can be automatically be built and tested on public services is not easy and takes a lot of time. For example, a lot of components of the image need to be cross-compiled, which is more complex to achieve than just compiling the same piece of software under QEMU. But compiling under QEMU is not an option, since doing this on public services (like Github Actions) is way too slow (several hours and hitting the run time limit of the service).

I started playing around with it and I will attest that its NOT easy... tons of personal time goes into this. So much so that my time won't allow me to do it. So THANK YOU for what you've put together so far!

[spewu]

Just to let you know that I'm still working on this. Implementing a Docker baseimage that supports multiple architectures/distros and that can be automatically be built and tested on public services is not easy and takes a lot of time. For example, a lot of components of the image need to be cross-compiled, which is more complex to achieve than just compiling the same piece of software under QEMU. But compiling under QEMU is not an option, since doing this on public services (like Github Actions) is way too slow (several hours and hitting the run time limit of the service).

Thanks a lot for spending time on this - It would be super awesome to have a multi-arch build 🥇

[alanbosco]

Just to let you know that I'm still working on this. Implementing a Docker baseimage that supports multiple architectures/distros and that can be automatically be built and tested on public services is not easy and takes a lot of time. For example, a lot of components of the image need to be cross-compiled, which is more complex to achieve than just compiling the same piece of software under QEMU. But compiling under QEMU is not an option, since doing this on public services (like Github Actions) is way too slow (several hours and hitting the run time limit of the service).

Thanks a lot!! if it's not too much to ask do you have a timeframe on this?

[yoanndelattre]

Any news on this subject?

[yonailo]

+1 to make it happen

[enricocirignaco]

• 1 thank you so much