Batch file for xdelta1/xdelta3 compatibility

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Xdelta3.bat:

::Batch file to allow input of Xdelta1 command line syntax for use with
Xdelta 3.

@echo off
echo.
echo This file allows input of Xdelta1 command line syntax for use with
Xdelta 3.
echo Xdelta3 must be named Xdelta30.exe.
echo.
echo.
echo Reminder of OLD V1 Syntax accepted in this batch file:
echo.
echo To Apply a Patch:
echo "xdelta1 patch [path to oldfile] [path to xdeltafile] [path to
patchedfile]"
echo.
echo To Generate a Delta Patch File:
echo "xdelta1 delta [path to oldfile] [path to target file] [path to new
xdelta file]"
echo.

::Example to generate best (smallest) Deltafile:
::xdelta30.exe  -9 -S djw -e -vfs OLD_FILE NEW_FILE DELTA_OUT_FILE
::Example to make a new patched (decoded) file from an old_file applying a
delta patch:
::xdelta30.exe -d -vfs OLD_FILE DELTA_FILE DECODED_FILE

IF %1==delta GOTO xdelta
IF %1==patch GOTO xpatch
goto exit

:XPATCH
xdelta30 -d -vfs %3 %2 %4
goto exit

:XDELTA
xdelta30  -9 -S djw -e -vfs %2 %3 %4
goto exit

:EXIT
exit 

Original issue reported on code.google.com by josh.mac...@gmail.com on 29 Jun 2007 at 12:51

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by josh.mac...@gmail.com on 29 Jun 2007 at 1:26

• Added labels: Featured

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by josh.mac...@gmail.com on 29 Jun 2007 at 1:26

• Added labels: Featured

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by josh.mac...@gmail.com on 29 Jun 2007 at 1:27

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by josh.mac...@gmail.com on 29 Jun 2007 at 1:27

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I offer the following batch file. This has improved compatibility with xdelta 
1.1.3

Syntax:
xdelta3 delta OLD_FILE NEW_FILE [DELTA_OUT_FILE]
xdelta3 patch DELTA_FILE OLD_FILE [DECODED_FILE]

I did this because the above batch file does not simulate xdelta 1.1.3 syntax
completely, the patch syntax is different.
In my copy of xdelta 1.1.3 it is:
xdelta: usage: xdelta COMMAND [OPTIONS] [ARG1 ...]
xdelta: COMMAND is one of:
xdelta:   delta     Produce a delta from ARG1 to ARG2 producing ARG3
xdelta:   info      List details about delta ARG1
xdelta:   patch     Apply patch ARG1 using file ARG2 producing ARG3

Note the patch file is listed first when patching, then the old file, then the 
new file.

Additionally when patching, xdelta 1.1.3 can take only the patch file, but with
xdelta3, that is not possible, the old file must be also specified.

(fixed typo)

Original comment by edwardk....@gmail.com on 1 Aug 2007 at 11:37

Attachments:

• xdelta3.bat

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I offer the following batch file. This has improved compatibility with xdelta 
1.1.3

Syntax:
xdelta3 delta OLD_FILE NEW_FILE [DELTA_OUT_FILE]
xdelta3 patch DELTA_FILE OLD_FILE [DECODED_FILE]

I did this because the above batch file does not simulate xdelta 1.1.3 syntax
completely, the patch syntax is different.
In my copy of xdelta 1.1.3 it is:
xdelta: usage: xdelta COMMAND [OPTIONS] [ARG1 ...]
xdelta: COMMAND is one of:
xdelta:   delta     Produce a delta from ARG1 to ARG2 producing ARG3
xdelta:   info      List details about delta ARG1
xdelta:   patch     Apply patch ARG1 using file ARG2 producing ARG3

Note the patch file is listed first when patching, then the old file, then the 
new file.

Additionally when patching, xdelta 1.1.3 can take only the patch file, but with
xdelta3, that is not possible, the old file must be also specified.

(fixed typo)

Original comment by edwardk....@gmail.com on 1 Aug 2007 at 11:37

Attachments:

• xdelta3.bat

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by hotmoney...@gmail.com on 8 Nov 2007 at 12:53

Attachments:

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by hotmoney...@gmail.com on 8 Nov 2007 at 12:53

Attachments:

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thanks for the good work being contributed

Original comment by vaidabhi...@gmail.com on 8 May 2008 at 11:36

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thanks for the good work being contributed

Original comment by vaidabhi...@gmail.com on 8 May 2008 at 11:36