New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coverage tool: "coverage-check" should disregard non-loaded classes for "perFile" scope #140

Closed
rliesenfeld opened this Issue Feb 18, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

1 participant
@rliesenfeld
Member

rliesenfeld commented Feb 18, 2015

Also, add a new scope, "loaded", which checks total coverage but only for classes that were loaded during the test run (useful when running some tests only).

@rliesenfeld rliesenfeld self-assigned this Feb 18, 2015

@rliesenfeld

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rliesenfeld

rliesenfeld Feb 22, 2015

Member

A new scope "loaded" is not needed, as we can instead use "coverage-classes=loaded".

Member

rliesenfeld commented Feb 22, 2015

A new scope "loaded" is not needed, as we can instead use "coverage-classes=loaded".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment