Messaging

[joemasilotti]

This PR addresses #120, #121, and #122. I tried to split this into 3 PRs, but I ended up rewriting so much of #130 that I don't think it is worth keeping them separate anymore.

All of the refactors from #130 have been pulled in, so check out that PR for details on the pundit changes.

I ended up simplifying the routes a ton to get the base functionality working. Instead of trying to nest conversations inside of developers, the route is more Rails-y: /conversations/:id. This helps clean up the controller logic a ton.

On top of that, to ensure only a Business can initiate a conversation, ColdMessagesController was added. This includes the logic for kicking off that first message and redirecting to an existing conversation if one exists.

Room for improvement / future PRs

• The Message form at the bottom of the conversation page could be Turbo-ified
• The new Business page is very barebones, and could use another design pass
  • There's probably new fields a Business wants to add, too

Pull request checklist

• Your code contains tests relevant for code you modified
• All new and existing tests are passing
• You have linted the project with bundle exec standardrb --fix
• You have linted the project with bundle exec erblint --lint-all --autocorrect

Closes #120, #121, and #122.

[joemasilotti]

CC @jacobdaddario and @Tonksthebear because you both expressed interest in these features. Would love to hear your thoughts or quick PR review before I merge.

[jacobdaddario]

Hey! Sorry I've been occupied with some other stuff recently. I'll take a look this evening!

[Tonksthebear]

Hey, I have a lot on my plate this week. I might be able to hop on and take a look, but I just wanted to acknowledge your message and give you a heads up to not wait on me. I will definitely take a look if I get a chance though!

[jacobdaddario]

Hey, sorry for not getting to this yesterday. Life has still been kicking my butt. I'll attempt to get to it tonight.

[jacobdaddario]

Looks good to me! I think there's things I would have approached a different way, but the logic you laid out all seems to make sense.