Issue labeling

John Kerl edited this page Aug 31, 2015 · 3 revisions

Initially I used high/medium/low but I didn't find those labels sufficiently compelling or informative. Some issues move through quickly due to their very simplicity, in spite of their non-urgency; on the other hand, very impactful issues might be quick fixes, or might be major projects. A high/medium/low scheme conflates sequencing with severity, and should not.

As of 2015-08-30 I am using the following to indicate sequencing:

  • active means being worked on
  • on deck means likely next to work on
  • unscheduled means everything but active, on deck, or wishlist
  • wishlist means I personally have no urgency for these, but feel free to pick them up if you're interested

I'm not using a label to indicate severity, although I do use "bug".

At some point I may create an separate, orthogonal label pair for complexity: e.g. quickfix vs. majorproject.

For documentation please see http://johnkerl.org/miller/doc

Clone this wiki locally
You can’t perform that action at this time.
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Press h to open a hovercard with more details.