Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simply use require #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 7, 2020
Merged

Conversation

utkarsh2102
Copy link
Contributor

@utkarsh2102 utkarsh2102 commented Apr 2, 2020

Hi,

This PR fixes the method of requiring aggregate by changing File.expand_path method to simply using require.

This comes handy for downstream (at least, in maintaining the Debian package of this library), where the tests fail when built in a clean environment (schroot).

Hope this could be integrated here, as well :)

CC: @josephruscio @halorgium

@utkarsh2102
Copy link
Contributor Author

And I think CI failure is unrelated here, right?

@nextmat
Copy link
Collaborator

nextmat commented Apr 3, 2020

The CI failure is related. This is the old form of require, needed before ruby 1.9 made require a little smarter.

That said I don't think anyone is using 1.8 in the field really anymore, this seems like a fine change and the CI matrix should probably be modernized.

@utkarsh2102
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nextmat, I intend to open a new PR for modernizing CI :)

@utkarsh2102 utkarsh2102 mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2020
@utkarsh2102
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi,
Any ETA on this?

@nextmat nextmat merged commit 37d95d2 into josephruscio:master May 7, 2020
@utkarsh2102 utkarsh2102 deleted the require-aggregate branch May 7, 2020 23:38
@nextmat
Copy link
Collaborator

nextmat commented May 8, 2020

@utkarsh2102 - thanks for the fix! this will be released in v0.2.3 shortly

@nextmat
Copy link
Collaborator

nextmat commented Dec 21, 2020

@utkarsh2102 - v0.2.3 was just released, apologize for the delay. I didn't previously have publishing rights for the gem we got that sorted, so I should be able to roll things out more quickly going forward.

@utkarsh2102
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awesome, thanks for your work! 🙌🏻❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants