Permalink
Browse files

Setting fcntl to None if not importable, adding tests module, updatin…

…g README to markdown.
  • Loading branch information...
Josh Marshall
Josh Marshall committed Oct 26, 2010
1 parent 283a2a9 commit 6a388ded772221c4b5fbb07ed69db8d57b0b583e
Showing with 614 additions and 34 deletions.
  1. +1 −0 .gitignore
  2. +0 −23 README
  3. +213 −0 README.md
  4. +6 −10 jsonrpclib/SimpleJSONRPCServer.py
  5. +0 −1 jsonrpclib/history.py
  6. +394 −0 tests.py
View
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+*.pyc
View
23 README
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-JSONRPClib
-==========
-This library is an implementation of the JSON-RPC specification.
-It supports both the original 1.0 specification, as well as the
-new (proposed) 2.0 spec, which includes batch submission, keyword
-arguments, etc.
-
-It is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0
-(http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html).
-
-Installation
-============
-To install:
-
- python setup.py build
- sudo python setup.py install
-
-To use this module, you'll need a JSON library. The library
-looks first for cjson, then for the built-in JSON library (with
-default Python 2.6+ distributions), and finally the simplejson
-library.
-
-
View
213 README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+JSONRPClib
+==========
+This library is an implementation of the JSON-RPC specification.
+It supports both the original 1.0 specification, as well as the
+new (proposed) 2.0 spec, which includes batch submission, keyword
+arguments, etc.
+
+It is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+(http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html).
+
+Communication
+-------------
+Feel free to send any questions, comments, or patches to our Google Group
+mailing list (you'll need to join to send a message):
+http://groups.google.com/group/jsonrpclib
+
+Summary
+-------
+This library implements the JSON-RPC 2.0 proposed specification in pure Python.
+It is designed to be as compatible with the syntax of xmlrpclib as possible
+(it extends where possible), so that projects using xmlrpclib could easily be
+modified to use JSON and experiment with the differences.
+
+It is backwards-compatible with the 1.0 specification, and supports all of the
+new proposed features of 2.0, including:
+
+* Batch submission (via MultiCall)
+* Keyword arguments
+* Notifications (both in a batch and 'normal')
+* Class translation using the 'jsonclass' key.
+
+I've added a "SimpleJSONRPCServer", which is intended to emulate the
+"SimpleXMLRPCServer" from the default Python distribution.
+
+Requirements
+------------
+It supports cjson and simplejson, and looks for the parsers in that order
+(searching first for cjson, then for the "built-in" simplejson as json in 2.6+,
+and then the simplejson external library). One of these must be installed to
+use this library, although if you have a standard distribution of 2.6+, you
+should already have one. Keep in mind that cjson is supposed to be the
+quickest, I believe, so if you are going for full-on optimization you may
+want to pick it up.
+
+Client Usage
+------------
+
+This is (obviously) taken from a console session.
+
+<code>
+ >>> import jsonrpclib
+ >>> server = jsonrpclib.Server('http://localhost:8080')
+ >>> server.add(5,6)
+ 11
+ >>> print jsonrpclib.history.request
+ {"jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [5, 6], "id": "gb3c9g37", "method": "add"}
+ >>> print jsonrpclib.history.response
+ {'jsonrpc': '2.0', 'result': 11, 'id': 'gb3c9g37'}
+ >>> server.add(x=5, y=10)
+ 15
+ >>> server._notify.add(5,6)
+ # No result returned...
+ >>> batch = jsonrpclib.MultiCall(server)
+ >>> batch.add(5, 6)
+ >>> batch.ping({'key':'value'})
+ >>> batch._notify.add(4, 30)
+ >>> results = batch()
+ >>> for result in results:
+ >>> ... print result
+ 11
+ {'key': 'value'}
+ # Note that there are only two responses -- this is according to spec.
+</code>
+
+If you need 1.0 functionality, there are a bunch of places you can pass that
+in, although the best is just to change the value on
+jsonrpclib.config.version:
+
+<code>
+ >>> import jsonrpclib
+ >>> jsonrpclib.config.version
+ 2.0
+ >>> jsonrpclib.config.version = 1.0
+ >>> server = jsonrpclib.Server('http://localhost:8080')
+ >>> server.add(7, 10)
+ 17
+ >>> print jsonrpclib..history.request
+ {"params": [7, 10], "id": "thes7tl2", "method": "add"}
+ >>> print jsonrpclib.history.response
+ {'id': 'thes7tl2', 'result': 17, 'error': None}
+ >>>
+</code>
+
+The equivalent loads and dumps functions also exist, although with minor
+modifications. The dumps arguments are almost identical, but it adds three
+arguments: rpcid for the 'id' key, version to specify the JSON-RPC
+compatibility, and notify if it's a request that you want to be a
+notification.
+
+Additionally, the loads method does not return the params and method like
+xmlrpclib, but instead a.) parses for errors, raising ProtocolErrors, and
+b.) returns the entire structure of the request / response for manual parsing.
+
+SimpleJSONRPCServer
+-------------------
+This is identical in usage (or should be) to the SimpleXMLRPCServer in the default Python install. Some of the differences in features are that it obviously supports notification, batch calls, class translation (if left on), etc. Note: The import line is slightly different from the regular SimpleXMLRPCServer, since the SimpleJSONRPCServer is distributed within the jsonrpclib library.
+
+<code>
+ from jsonrpclib.SimpleJSONRPCServer import SimpleJSONRPCServer
+
+ server = SimpleJSONRPCServer(('localhost', 8080))
+ server.register_function(pow)
+ server.register_function(lambda x,y: x+y, 'add')
+ server.register_function(lambda x: x, 'ping')
+ server.serve_forever()
+</code>
+
+Class Translation
+-----------------
+I've recently added "automatic" class translation support, although it is
+turned off by default. This can be devastatingly slow if improperly used, so
+the following is just a short list of things to keep in mind when using it.
+
+* Keep It (the object) Simple Stupid. (for exceptions, keep reading.)
+* Do not require init params (for exceptions, keep reading)
+* Getter properties without setters could be dangerous (read: not tested)
+
+If any of the above are issues, use the _serialize method. (see usage below)
+The server and client must BOTH have use_jsonclass configuration item on and
+they must both have access to the same libraries used by the objects for
+this to work.
+
+If you have excessively nested arguments, it would be better to turn off the
+translation and manually invoke it on specific objects using
+jsonrpclib.jsonclass.dump / jsonrpclib.jsonclass.load (since the default
+behavior recursively goes through attributes and lists / dicts / tuples).
+
+[test_obj.py]
+
+<code>
+ # This object is /very/ simple, and the system will look through the
+ # attributes and serialize what it can.
+ class TestObj(object):
+ foo = 'bar'
+
+ # This object requires __init__ params, so it uses the _serialize method
+ # and returns a tuple of init params and attribute values (the init params
+ # can be a dict or a list, but the attribute values must be a dict.)
+ class TestSerial(object):
+ foo = 'bar'
+ def __init__(self, *args):
+ self.args = args
+ def _serialize(self):
+ return (self.args, {'foo':self.foo,})
+</code>
+
+[usage]
+
+<code>
+ import jsonrpclib
+ import test_obj
+
+ jsonrpclib.config.use_jsonclass = True
+
+ testobj1 = test_obj.TestObj()
+ testobj2 = test_obj.TestSerial()
+ server = jsonrpclib.Server('http://localhost:8080')
+ # The 'ping' just returns whatever is sent
+ ping1 = server.ping(testobj1)
+ ping2 = server.ping(testobj2)
+ print jsonrpclib.history.request
+ # {"jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [{"__jsonclass__": ["test_obj.TestSerial", ["foo"]]}], "id": "a0l976iv", "method": "ping"}
+ print jsonrpclib.history.result
+ # {'jsonrpc': '2.0', 'result': <test_obj.TestSerial object at 0x2744590>, 'id': 'a0l976iv'}
+</code>
+
+To turn on this behaviour, just set jsonrpclib.config.use_jsonclass to True.
+If you want to use a different method for serialization, just set
+jsonrpclib.config.serialize_method to the method name. Finally, if you are
+using classes that you have defined in the implementation (as in, not a
+separate library), you'll need to add those (on BOTH the server and the
+client) using the jsonrpclib.config.classes.add() method.
+(Examples forthcoming.)
+
+Feedback on this "feature" is very, VERY much appreciated.
+
+Why JSON-RPC?
+-------------
+In my opinion, there are several reasons to choose JSON over XML for RPC:
+
+* Much simpler to read (I suppose this is opinion, but I know I'm right. :)
+* Size / Bandwidth - Main reason, a JSON object representation is just much smaller.
+* Parsing - JSON should be much quicker to parse than XML.
+* Easy class passing with jsonclass (when enabled)
+
+In the interest of being fair, there are also a few reasons to choose XML
+over JSON:
+
+* Your server doesn't do JSON (rather obvious)
+* Wider XML-RPC support across APIs (can we change this? :))
+* Libraries are more established, i.e. more stable (Let's change this too.)
+
+TESTS
+-----
+I've dropped almost-verbatim tests from the JSON-RPC spec 2.0 page.
+You can run it with:
+
+ python tests.py
+
+TODO
+----
+* Use HTTP error codes on SimpleJSONRPCServer
+* Test, test, test and optimize
@@ -4,8 +4,12 @@
import SocketServer
import types
import traceback
-import fcntl
import sys
+try:
+ import fcntl
+except ImportError:
+ # For Windows
+ fcntl = None
def get_version(request):
# must be a dict
@@ -173,8 +177,7 @@ def do_POST(self):
self.wfile.flush()
self.connection.shutdown(1)
-class SimpleJSONRPCServer(SocketServer.TCPServer,
- SimpleJSONRPCDispatcher):
+class SimpleJSONRPCServer(SocketServer.TCPServer, SimpleJSONRPCDispatcher):
allow_reuse_address = True
@@ -209,10 +212,3 @@ def handle_jsonrpc(self, request_text):
sys.stdout.write(response)
handle_xmlrpc = handle_jsonrpc
-
-if __name__ == '__main__':
- print 'Running JSON-RPC server on port 8000'
- server = SimpleJSONRPCServer(("localhost", 8000))
- server.register_function(pow)
- server.register_function(lambda x,y: x+y, 'add')
- server.serve_forever()
View
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-
class History(object):
"""
This holds all the response and request objects for a
Oops, something went wrong.

0 comments on commit 6a388de

Please sign in to comment.