@TomAndrews, we were so focused on adding tests for the .xts() constructor that we didn't add any for the actual bug @Eluvias reported! We would have caught this if we had a regression test for reclass(). I'll make sure one is added.
@philaris thanks for the kind words and the contribution!
The result of reclass() always returned an object with a POSIXct
tclass, even if 'match.to' did not have a POSIXct tclass. The test,
test.reclass_preserves_match.to_tclass(), fails if the changes to xts.R
are not applied.