Skip to content
Permalink
Browse files
Update README.md
  • Loading branch information
umputun committed Jan 20, 2016
1 parent e92aa90 commit fe9732cf30995f6f8b3b5b7f010a70964112b8bd
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
Quick instructions:

```bash
CID=$(docker run -d --privileged -p 1194:1194/udp -p 443:443/tcp umputun/openvpn)
docker run -t -i -p 8080:8080 --volumes-from $CID umputun/openvpn serveconfig
CID=$(docker run -d --privileged -p 1194:1194/udp -p 443:443/tcp umputun/dockvpn)
docker run -t -i -p 8080:8080 --volumes-from $CID umputun/dockvpn serveconfig
```

Now download the file located at the indicated URL. You will get a

5 comments on commit fe9732c

@osminogin
Copy link

@osminogin osminogin commented on fe9732c Aug 10, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very useful changes.

@umputun
Copy link
Author

@umputun umputun commented on fe9732c Aug 10, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure what this comment about, but as far as i recall the change you indicated was to match name of container with the one I build on dockerhub.

@osminogin
Copy link

@osminogin osminogin commented on fe9732c Aug 10, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Original sources licensed under Apache license, so you need:

  1. Identify original author and link to them.

  2. Change the project name (under the terms of Apache license).

or ask author to license under different terms.

@umputun
Copy link
Author

@umputun umputun commented on fe9732c Aug 10, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dear author, do you care about any of this? The only reason for my fork existence is (was) to address key-size issue and make your wonderful container working again with tunnelblick asap. I thought github's "fork from" is adequate form of link to the original project. If by some reason you want me to rename the fork - sure I can do it if github supports such renames. But I don't think there is a reason to rename image on docker-hub. First - this is not the same (different prefix) and second - there are tens of blah/dockvpn repos on hub already.

@maximkulkin
Copy link

@maximkulkin maximkulkin commented on fe9732c Aug 10, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@osminogin

  1. Apache license does not require identifying or linking to original author. It requires to preserve license and all copyrights/trademarks/etc (section 4.a and 4.c of LICENSE). It is the original author responsibility to put copyrights in right places (e.g. at the end of LICENSE file, but right now there is only template line "Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]"). Other project files are not even copyrighted.
  2. It does not require in this case changing project name (section 6 of LICENSE):

This License does not grant permission to use ... product names of the Licensor, except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the origin of the Work ...

Since almost all code is the original code, it is reasonable to use original project name.

Please sign in to comment.