New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed "jquery.mobile" prefix from filenames #6465

Closed
wants to merge 325 commits into
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
@gseguin
Member

gseguin commented Sep 13, 2013

No description provided.

@ghost ghost assigned scottjehl and gseguin Sep 23, 2013

arschmitz and others added some commits Sep 24, 2013

Demos: View source: Reposition popup when any collapsible is collapse…
…d, or when the first collapsible is expanded.
Demos: Use and document $( ":mobile-pagecontainer" ).pagecontainer( "…
…change"/"load" ) instead of $.mobile.change/loadPage().
Panel: Reduced selectors.
We only add position classes to the wrapper and fixed toolbars in case
of reveal and push panels, and not when it's a overlay panel. So there
is no need to target reveal and push.
Moved classic theme from CSS themes folder to the demos.
Because it's not a supported feature we don't include the classic theme
in the CSS folder so the demo didn't work.
Demos: Popup outside the page: Set theme "a" explicitly, because the …
…popup outside the page does not inherit a theme from anywhere.

gabrielschulhof and others added some commits Nov 14, 2013

Gruntfile.js: Distribute jquery.mobile.icons.css, and add replacement…
… rules for when references to it exist in the demos markup. Fixes #6677 - Demos- Classic theme
Revert "Tests: Another attempt at making TravisCI happy. split jquery…
….mobile.js into main.js and jquery.mobile.js"

This reverts commit bcc8d2f.
Revert "Tests: Another attempt at making TravisCI happy. Removed susp…
…icious test ( chosen kinda randomly )"

This reverts commit 27296fc.
@arschmitz

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arschmitz

arschmitz Feb 6, 2014

Member

at this point i think there would probably be to many conflict to merge this easily @gseguin whats your thoughts here?

Member

arschmitz commented Feb 6, 2014

at this point i think there would probably be to many conflict to merge this easily @gseguin whats your thoughts here?

@arschmitz arschmitz added this to the 1.5.0 milestone Feb 6, 2014

gseguin added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2014

gseguin added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2014

gseguin added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2014

@arschmitz arschmitz closed this Feb 23, 2014

@gseguin

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@gseguin

gseguin Feb 23, 2014

Member

Created a new PR #7100

Member

gseguin commented Feb 23, 2014

Created a new PR #7100

@gseguin gseguin deleted the no-prefix branch Feb 23, 2014

gseguin added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2014

gseguin added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2014

gseguin added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2014

gseguin added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2014

gseguin added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2014

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment