-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 925
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
[Truffle] benchmark-ips sample file runs - some formatting errors.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
0cd457e
commit 6199915
Showing
6 changed files
with
165 additions
and
38 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
6199915
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if this is a personal preference or a consistency issue, but I like that we use the parameter name "block" for Ruby blocks. It makes it easy for them to stick out in a sea of UndefinedPlaceholders.
6199915
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah - I guess unless you look at the
@CoreMethod
annotation you can't tell if it's a final argument that just happens to be aProc
or a block. We can check it's consistently calledblock
when we next do a big refactor (we need to merge another branch first).