New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updating no-target-blank logic to only require no-referrer #2043
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Per discussion; it is in no way clear that this is an acceptable change to make.
See #2022 (comment).
@ljharb Probably should've noted that I only made this so it's available if the team decides to go through with it. |
@ljharb Also shared what I found for research on the issue, I'm not sure if it's actually enough to draw a conclusion from but it seems like a pretty valid source to me. |
Reopening per #2022 (comment) |
8e34d42
to
f26789d
Compare
Rebased this, and kept all existing test cases rather than modifying them. |
6893aed
to
a8f648a
Compare
a8f648a
to
b9d2eb5
Compare
Fixes #2022
Just a minor change to only require
no-referrer
rather than bothnoreferrer noopener
.