Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Feature/hadoop processing fixes #34
Conversation
petevg
added some commits
Dec 2, 2016
|
Out of curiosity, why have two decorators instead of one called as either |
|
@johnsca Since most of the actions don't need tags, I figured it was cleaner to have |
petevg
added some commits
Dec 2, 2016
petevg
referenced this pull request
Dec 6, 2016
Closed
Glitch is too aggressive on non HA bundles #29
johnsca
merged commit 1ac2fd5
into
master
Dec 8, 2016
petevg
deleted the
feature/hadoop-processing-fixes
branch
Dec 20, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
petevg commentedDec 2, 2016
@bcsaller @johnsca This gets us to the point where we can deploy and run glitch on the hadoop-processing bundle.
Resetting fails -- we run into that "bundle is changing too fast" error. But we already have an issue open related to that.
This probably conflicts w/ #32
Will work on that next ...