New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prepare hack.commit.push #431
Comments
Regarding the JUnit 5 version we depend on: We usually want to depend on the lowest minor version (newest patch of that) that supports our feature set. Generally speaking, that's still the case, but the upcoming hack.commit.push event required an exception. Updating from Jupiter 5.6 to 5.7 requires some changes to our test code, which means it's a bit disruptive. In case some contributors need to update during the event, they would also need to make these changes in our test code, which would be an unnecessary burden. To preempt that, I decided to update to 5.7 now. |
We usually want to depend on the lowest minor version (newest patch of that) that supports our feature set. Generally speaking, that's still the case, but the upcoming hack.commit.push event required an exception: Updating from Jupiter 5.6 to 5.7 requires some changes to our test code, which means it's a bit disruptive. In case some contributors need to update during the event, they would also need to make these changes in our test code, which would be an unnecessary burden. To preempt that, I decided to update to 5.7 now. Relates to: #431 PR: #445
Just to note it: We discussed the update in team call and we all were fine to update it. |
Extend the contribution guide with links to guides on creating Jupiter extensions as well as on the project itself. Related to: #431
We should probably discuss how to best provide support during the event. I'll definitely be live-streaming my side of it, so coming to Twitch is one way to get in touch. Then there are the issues and pull requests here on GitHub that we can monitor and reply to. The question is, do we need more?
It might also be helpful to define one place where we expect contributors to check in occasionally in case we need to broadcast to all of them. Not sure why we'd want to do that, but it may be a good idea to at least have the option. Other ideas or concerns regarding this? |
FYI, we're going to use https://workadventu.re/ (+ dedicated Slack) for the event (it may change if we face any unexpected difficulties but that's the current plan). Every group is of course free to use its own tooling. |
I think that will be fine, thanks @fbiville! |
HCP is over now, so we've obviously done everything. 😊 |
Things we need to do before hack.commit.push:
Things we could do:
master
tomain
~> Evaluate to rename master branch to main #331The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: