Prefer IP address over hostname when available#3593
Merged
takluyver merged 2 commits intojupyter:masterfrom May 5, 2018
Merged
Prefer IP address over hostname when available#3593takluyver merged 2 commits intojupyter:masterfrom
takluyver merged 2 commits intojupyter:masterfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
And are there any other values for |
|
To me its working fine with this code. Thanks [UPDATED @evandam ] |
cyberwillis
approved these changes
May 4, 2018
cyberwillis
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To me this changes are working great !
I tested all the cases.
Contributor
|
Looks great to me! Does this handle when you do something like |
|
Yes, it does. I have tested earlier. |
Contributor
|
Just read that after I asked. I'm all for this! |
|
:) |
Member
Author
|
Thanks both! In it goes. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following discussion on #3356.
@evandam @cyberwillis please let me know if you think this is a good idea. I haven't encountered the same issues as either of you, so I don't want to merge this without some confirmation that it's actually an improvement!