diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 5dcce036463428..a23e5eb728c83d 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -707,6 +707,7 @@ struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor { bool ip_stable; u8 adj_off; u16 reason; + u32 insn_idx; }; /* reg_type info for ctx arguments */ diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 814bc6c1ad167b..8a18756953de98 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -9623,6 +9623,18 @@ static void adjust_subprog_starts(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, u32 len } } +static void adjust_poke_descs(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 len) +{ + struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *tab = prog->aux->poke_tab; + int i, sz = prog->aux->size_poke_tab; + struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *desc; + + for (i = 0; i < sz; i++) { + desc = &tab[i]; + desc->insn_idx += len - 1; + } +} + static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len) { @@ -9639,6 +9651,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of if (adjust_insn_aux_data(env, new_prog, off, len)) return NULL; adjust_subprog_starts(env, off, len); + adjust_poke_descs(new_prog, len); return new_prog; } @@ -10169,6 +10182,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog, **func, *tmp; int i, j, subprog_start, subprog_end = 0, len, subprog; + struct bpf_map *map_ptr; struct bpf_insn *insn; void *old_bpf_func; int err, num_exentries; @@ -10236,6 +10250,31 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) func[i]->aux->btf = prog->aux->btf; func[i]->aux->func_info = prog->aux->func_info; + for (j = 0; j < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; j++) { + u32 insn_idx = prog->aux->poke_tab[j].insn_idx; + int ret; + + if (!(insn_idx >= subprog_start && + insn_idx <= subprog_end)) + continue; + + ret = bpf_jit_add_poke_descriptor(func[i], + &prog->aux->poke_tab[j]); + if (ret < 0) { + verbose(env, "adding tail call poke descriptor failed\n"); + goto out_free; + } + + func[i]->insnsi[insn_idx - subprog_start].imm = ret + 1; + + map_ptr = func[i]->aux->poke_tab[ret].tail_call.map; + ret = map_ptr->ops->map_poke_track(map_ptr, func[i]->aux); + if (ret < 0) { + verbose(env, "tracking tail call prog failed\n"); + goto out_free; + } + } + /* Use bpf_prog_F_tag to indicate functions in stack traces. * Long term would need debug info to populate names */ @@ -10261,6 +10300,19 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } cond_resched(); } + + /* Untrack main program's aux structs so that during map_poke_run() + * we will not stumble upon the unfilled poke descriptors; each + * of the main program's poke descs got distributed across subprogs + * and got tracked onto map, so we are sure that none of them will + * be missed after the operation below + */ + for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) { + map_ptr = prog->aux->poke_tab[i].tail_call.map; + + map_ptr->ops->map_poke_untrack(map_ptr, prog->aux); + } + /* at this point all bpf functions were successfully JITed * now populate all bpf_calls with correct addresses and * run last pass of JIT @@ -10329,9 +10381,16 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) bpf_prog_free_unused_jited_linfo(prog); return 0; out_free: - for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) - if (func[i]) - bpf_jit_free(func[i]); + for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) { + if (!func[i]) + continue; + + for (j = 0; j < func[i]->aux->size_poke_tab; j++) { + map_ptr = func[i]->aux->poke_tab[j].tail_call.map; + map_ptr->ops->map_poke_untrack(map_ptr, func[i]->aux); + } + bpf_jit_free(func[i]); + } kfree(func); out_undo_insn: /* cleanup main prog to be interpreted */ @@ -10549,6 +10608,7 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) .reason = BPF_POKE_REASON_TAIL_CALL, .tail_call.map = BPF_MAP_PTR(aux->map_ptr_state), .tail_call.key = bpf_map_key_immediate(aux), + .insn_idx = i + delta, }; ret = bpf_jit_add_poke_descriptor(prog, &desc);