You can clone with
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
Problems are listed in approximate order of priority.- When displaying MIME headers, rfc 2047 decoding is applied (which should not happen), and rfc 2231 decoding is not applied (which should happen).- Help formatting could be revamped a bit.- In the "attachment" menu, assume this: 1 [text/plain, 7bit, 1.1K] <no description> 2 [message/rfc822, 7bit, 6.1K] A test message 3 [text/plain, 7bit, 0.1K] |-><no description> 4 [message/rfc822, base64, 2.5K] |-><no description> 5 [message/rfc822, base64, 2.7K] `-><no description> (please note the "message/rfc822" attachments encoded as Base64; that's illegal, but Sun's Mailtool sends that kind of messages); then go to, say, attachment "4", delete it, and go to the main menu; you won't be able to quit the mailbox (ok, 'x' works, but 'q' doesn't). The problem here lies in the fact that mutt uses mailbox handling functions to access message/rfc822 type attachments. We'd need to perform an additional decoding step before using these functions to fix this bug. Please note that mutt's just assuming RFC-compliant mail here. Fixing this stuff may become a PITA.- BODY struct should probably have a pointer to its corresponding HEADER struct. this is needed for mh/maildir mailboxes so the correct pathname can be found. Or perhaps all we need is a .hdr member of the STATE struct so that all of the MIME handlers can look up the corresponding HEADERs if need be?- handle message/external-body in some fashion- handle message/partial reconstruction- make patterns generic (I have patches for this -tlr), and introduce generic menu limiting, menu pattern searching, and the like. Note: This still requires some thought, since we'd have to store per-entry data in the menu structure. As an alternative, we could extend the tag method to do something to more general flags. The latter approach would make the implementation of propper tag-prefix behaviour more simple: Functions should only be applied when a message is tagged and visible. Additionally, we must not access a menu's max field directly any more: Adding an entry to a menu will require re-allocating and possibly updating the v2r array. How do we handle "in-the-middle additions" properly? Do they happen at all?