fix(bridge): Fix relative weight calculation (#9099)

[Kirdock]

Backport of #9099

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #9114 (1eb829a) into 0.19.x (b5fa4bf) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           0.19.x    #9114      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.32%   70.32%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         622      622              
  Lines       32940    32945       +5     
  Branches     1725     1726       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        23165    23168       +3     
- Misses       8535     8537       +2     
  Partials     1240     1240              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...uation-details/ktb-evaluation-details.component.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ktb-sli-breakdown/ktb-sli-breakdown.component.html	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...s/ktb-sli-breakdown/ktb-sli-breakdown.component.ts	93.65% <60.00%> (-1.44%)	⬇️
bridge/shared/models/result-types.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flag	Coverage Δ
bridge-server	73.99% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[thisthat]

Would it make sense also to add a test that covers the usage of getRelativeSliWeight?

[Kirdock]

Would it make sense also to add a test that covers the usage of getRelativeSliWeight?

Yes, but then we would need anoher backport to the main branch. This change is something that should have been considered in the original PR.

[Kirdock]

Would it make sense also to add a test that covers the usage of getRelativeSliWeight?

Yes, but then we would need anoher backport to the main branch. This change is something that should have been considered in the original PR.

[thisthat]

Fair point, this would violate the cherry-picking. Therefore, I would suggest that it is not needed for this PR