-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
libbpf: Fix btf dump error caused by #75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Master branch: 08d4dba |
|
Master branch: 80bebeb |
fc45fc8 to
7946ff0
Compare
|
Master branch: dda7596 |
7946ff0 to
eb0aacb
Compare
|
Master branch: 5e214f2 |
eb0aacb to
31040fa
Compare
|
Master branch: c62dd8a |
31040fa to
6ea2c5a
Compare
Currently if a forward declaration appears in the BTF before the definition,
the definition is dumped as a conflicting name, eg:
$ bpftool btf dump file vmlinux format raw | grep "'unix_sock'"
[81287] FWD 'unix_sock' fwd_kind=struct
[89336] STRUCT 'unix_sock' size=1024 vlen=14
$ bpftool btf dump file vmlinux format c | grep "struct unix_sock"
struct unix_sock;
struct unix_sock___2 { <--- conflict, the "___2" is unexpected
struct unix_sock___2 *unix_sk;
This causes a "definition not found" compilation error if the dump output
is used as a header file.
Fix it by skipping forward declaration when counting duplicated type names.
Fixes: 351131b ("libbpf: add btf_dump API for BTF-to-C conversion")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
|
Master branch: 07609c1 |
Update btf_dump case for conflicting names caused by forward declaration. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
6ea2c5a to
dbade19
Compare
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617492 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
With latest clang18, I hit test_progs failures for the following test: #13/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #13/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #13 bpf_cookie:FAIL #75 fentry_fexit:FAIL #76/1 fentry_test/fentry:FAIL #76 fentry_test:FAIL #80/1 fexit_test/fexit:FAIL #80 fexit_test:FAIL #110/1 kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL #110/2 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL #110/3 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms:FAIL #110/4 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_pattern:FAIL #110/5 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs:FAIL #110/6 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_syms:FAIL #110 kprobe_multi_test:FAIL For example, for #13/2, the error messages are ... kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kprobe_test7_result unexpected kprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1 ... kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kretprobe_test7_result unexpected kretprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1 clang17 does not have this issue. Further investigation shows that kernel func bpf_fentry_test7(), used in the above tests, is inlined by the compiler although it is marked as noinline. int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) { return (long)arg; } It is known that for simple functions like the above (e.g. just returning a constant or an input argument), the clang compiler may still do inlining for a noinline function. Adding 'asm volatile ("")' in the beginning of the bpf_fentry_test7() can prevent inlining. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
With latest clang18, I hit test_progs failures for the following test: #13/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #13/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #13 bpf_cookie:FAIL #75 fentry_fexit:FAIL #76/1 fentry_test/fentry:FAIL #76 fentry_test:FAIL #80/1 fexit_test/fexit:FAIL #80 fexit_test:FAIL #110/1 kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL #110/2 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL #110/3 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms:FAIL #110/4 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_pattern:FAIL #110/5 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs:FAIL #110/6 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_syms:FAIL #110 kprobe_multi_test:FAIL For example, for #13/2, the error messages are ... kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kprobe_test7_result unexpected kprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1 ... kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kretprobe_test7_result unexpected kretprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1 clang17 does not have this issue. Further investigation shows that kernel func bpf_fentry_test7(), used in the above tests, is inlined by the compiler although it is marked as noinline. int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) { return (long)arg; } It is known that for simple functions like the above (e.g. just returning a constant or an input argument), the clang compiler may still do inlining for a noinline function. Adding 'asm volatile ("")' in the beginning of the bpf_fentry_test7() can prevent inlining. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
With latest clang18, I hit test_progs failures for the following test: #13/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #13/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #13 bpf_cookie:FAIL #75 fentry_fexit:FAIL #76/1 fentry_test/fentry:FAIL #76 fentry_test:FAIL #80/1 fexit_test/fexit:FAIL #80 fexit_test:FAIL #110/1 kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL #110/2 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL #110/3 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms:FAIL #110/4 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_pattern:FAIL #110/5 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs:FAIL #110/6 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_syms:FAIL #110 kprobe_multi_test:FAIL For example, for #13/2, the error messages are ... kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kprobe_test7_result unexpected kprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1 ... kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kretprobe_test7_result unexpected kretprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1 clang17 does not have this issue. Further investigation shows that kernel func bpf_fentry_test7(), used in the above tests, is inlined by the compiler although it is marked as noinline. int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) { return (long)arg; } It is known that for simple functions like the above (e.g. just returning a constant or an input argument), the clang compiler may still do inlining for a noinline function. Adding 'asm volatile ("")' in the beginning of the bpf_fentry_test7() can prevent inlining. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
With latest clang18, I hit test_progs failures for the following test: #13/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #13/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #13 bpf_cookie:FAIL #75 fentry_fexit:FAIL #76/1 fentry_test/fentry:FAIL #76 fentry_test:FAIL #80/1 fexit_test/fexit:FAIL #80 fexit_test:FAIL #110/1 kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL #110/2 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL #110/3 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms:FAIL #110/4 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_pattern:FAIL #110/5 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs:FAIL #110/6 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_syms:FAIL #110 kprobe_multi_test:FAIL For example, for #13/2, the error messages are: [...] kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kprobe_test7_result unexpected kprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1 [...] kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kretprobe_test7_result unexpected kretprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1 clang17 does not have this issue. Further investigation shows that kernel func bpf_fentry_test7(), used in the above tests, is inlined by the compiler although it is marked as noinline. int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) { return (long)arg; } It is known that for simple functions like the above (e.g. just returning a constant or an input argument), the clang compiler may still do inlining for a noinline function. Adding 'asm volatile ("")' in the beginning of the bpf_fentry_test7() can prevent inlining. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230826200843.2210074-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
With latest clang18, I hit test_progs failures for the following test: #13/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL #13/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL #13 bpf_cookie:FAIL #75 fentry_fexit:FAIL #76/1 fentry_test/fentry:FAIL #76 fentry_test:FAIL #80/1 fexit_test/fexit:FAIL #80 fexit_test:FAIL #110/1 kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL #110/2 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL #110/3 kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms:FAIL #110/4 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_pattern:FAIL #110/5 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs:FAIL #110/6 kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_syms:FAIL #110 kprobe_multi_test:FAIL For example, for #13/2, the error messages are ... kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kprobe_test7_result unexpected kprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1 ... kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kretprobe_test7_result unexpected kretprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1 clang17 does not have this issue. Further investigation shows that kernel func bpf_fentry_test7(), used in the above tests, is inlined by the compiler although it is marked as noinline. int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) { return (long)arg; } It is known that for simple functions like the above (e.g. just returning a constant or an input argument), the clang compiler may still do inlining for a noinline function. Adding 'asm volatile ("")' in the beginning of the bpf_fentry_test7() can prevent inlining. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Specify the threshold for dumping offcpu samples with --off-cpu-thresh,
the unit is milliseconds. Default value is 500ms.
Example:
perf record --off-cpu --off-cpu-thresh 824
The example above collects direct off-cpu samples where the off-cpu time
is longer than 824ms.
Committer testing:
After commenting out the end off-cpu dump to have just the ones that are
added right after the task is scheduled back, and using a threshould of
1000ms, we see some periods (the 5th column, just before "offcpu-time"
in the 'perf script' output) that are over 1000.000.000 nanoseconds:
root@number:~# perf record --off-cpu --off-cpu-thresh 10000
^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 3.902 MB perf.data (34335 samples) ]
root@number:~# perf script
<SNIP>
Isolated Web Co 59932 [028] 63839.594437: 1000049427 offcpu-time:
7fe63c7976c2 __syscall_cancel_arch_end+0x0 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
7fe63c78c04c __futex_abstimed_wait_common+0x7c (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
7fe63c78e928 pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2+0x178 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
5599974a9fe7 mozilla::detail::ConditionVariableImpl::wait_for(mozilla::detail::MutexImpl&, mozilla::BaseTimeDuration<mozilla::TimeDurationValueCalculator> const&)+0xe7 (/usr/lib64/fir>
100000000 [unknown] ([unknown])
swapper 0 [025] 63839.594459: 195724 cycles:P: ffffffffac328270 read_tsc+0x0 ([kernel.kallsyms])
Isolated Web Co 59932 [010] 63839.594466: 1000055278 offcpu-time:
7fe63c7976c2 __syscall_cancel_arch_end+0x0 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
7fe63c78ba24 __syscall_cancel+0x14 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
7fe63c804c4e __poll+0x1e (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
7fe633b0d1b8 PollWrapper(_GPollFD*, unsigned int, int) [clone .lto_priv.0]+0xf8 (/usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so)
10000002c [unknown] ([unknown])
swapper 0 [027] 63839.594475: 134433 cycles:P: ffffffffad4c45d9 irqentry_enter+0x19 ([kernel.kallsyms])
swapper 0 [028] 63839.594499: 215838 cycles:P: ffffffffac39199a switch_mm_irqs_off+0x10a ([kernel.kallsyms])
MediaPD~oder #1 1407676 [027] 63839.594514: 134433 cycles:P: 7f982ef5e69f dct_IV(int*, int, int*)+0x24f (/usr/lib64/libfdk-aac.so.2.0.0)
swapper 0 [024] 63839.594524: 267411 cycles:P: ffffffffad4c6ee6 poll_idle+0x56 ([kernel.kallsyms])
MediaSu~sor #75 1093827 [026] 63839.594555: 332652 cycles:P: 55be753ad030 moz_xmalloc+0x200 (/usr/lib64/firefox/firefox)
swapper 0 [027] 63839.594616: 160548 cycles:P: ffffffffad144840 menu_select+0x570 ([kernel.kallsyms])
Isolated Web Co 14019 [027] 63839.595120: 1000050178 offcpu-time:
7fc9537cc6c2 __syscall_cancel_arch_end+0x0 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
7fc9537c104c __futex_abstimed_wait_common+0x7c (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
7fc9537c3928 pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2+0x178 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
7fc95372a3c8 pt_TimedWait+0xb8 (/usr/lib64/libnspr4.so)
7fc95372a8d8 PR_WaitCondVar+0x68 (/usr/lib64/libnspr4.so)
7fc94afb1f7c WatchdogMain(void*)+0xac (/usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so)
7fc947498660 [unknown] ([unknown])
7fc9535fce88 [unknown] ([unknown])
7fc94b620e60 WatchdogManager::~WatchdogManager()+0x0 (/usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so)
fff8548387f8b48 [unknown] ([unknown])
swapper 0 [003] 63839.595712: 212948 cycles:P: ffffffffacd5b865 acpi_os_read_port+0x55 ([kernel.kallsyms])
<SNIP>
Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241108204137.2444151-2-howardchu95@gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250501022809.449767-10-howardchu95@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Pull request for series with
subject: libbpf: Fix btf dump error caused by
version: 2
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617492