Skip to content

Conversation

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: libbpf: Fix btf dump error caused by
version: 2
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617492

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 08d4dba
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617492
version: 2

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 80bebeb
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617492
version: 2

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: dda7596
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617492
version: 2

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 5e214f2
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617492
version: 2

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: c62dd8a
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617492
version: 2

Nobody and others added 2 commits February 28, 2022 07:39
Currently if a forward declaration appears in the BTF before the definition,
the definition is dumped as a conflicting name, eg:

    $ bpftool btf dump file vmlinux format raw | grep "'unix_sock'"
    [81287] FWD 'unix_sock' fwd_kind=struct
    [89336] STRUCT 'unix_sock' size=1024 vlen=14

    $ bpftool btf dump file vmlinux format c | grep "struct unix_sock"
    struct unix_sock;
    struct unix_sock___2 {	<--- conflict, the "___2" is unexpected
		    struct unix_sock___2 *unix_sk;

This causes a "definition not found" compilation error if the dump output
is used as a header file.

Fix it by skipping forward declaration when counting duplicated type names.

Fixes: 351131b ("libbpf: add btf_dump API for BTF-to-C conversion")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 07609c1
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617492
version: 2

Update btf_dump case for conflicting names caused by forward declaration.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617492 irrelevant now. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-bot kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/617492=>bpf-next branch February 28, 2022 15:46
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2023
With latest clang18, I hit test_progs failures for the following test:
  #13/2    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
  #13/3    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
  #13      bpf_cookie:FAIL
  #75      fentry_fexit:FAIL
  #76/1    fentry_test/fentry:FAIL
  #76      fentry_test:FAIL
  #80/1    fexit_test/fexit:FAIL
  #80      fexit_test:FAIL
  #110/1   kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL
  #110/2   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL
  #110/3   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms:FAIL
  #110/4   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_pattern:FAIL
  #110/5   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs:FAIL
  #110/6   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_syms:FAIL
  #110     kprobe_multi_test:FAIL

For example, for #13/2, the error messages are
  ...
  kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kprobe_test7_result unexpected kprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1
  ...
  kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kretprobe_test7_result unexpected kretprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1

clang17 does not have this issue.

Further investigation shows that kernel func bpf_fentry_test7(), used
in the above tests, is inlined by the compiler although it is
marked as noinline.

  int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
  {
        return (long)arg;
  }

It is known that for simple functions like the above (e.g. just returning
a constant or an input argument), the clang compiler may still do inlining
for a noinline function. Adding 'asm volatile ("")' in the beginning of the
bpf_fentry_test7() can prevent inlining.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2023
With latest clang18, I hit test_progs failures for the following test:
  #13/2    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
  #13/3    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
  #13      bpf_cookie:FAIL
  #75      fentry_fexit:FAIL
  #76/1    fentry_test/fentry:FAIL
  #76      fentry_test:FAIL
  #80/1    fexit_test/fexit:FAIL
  #80      fexit_test:FAIL
  #110/1   kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL
  #110/2   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL
  #110/3   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms:FAIL
  #110/4   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_pattern:FAIL
  #110/5   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs:FAIL
  #110/6   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_syms:FAIL
  #110     kprobe_multi_test:FAIL

For example, for #13/2, the error messages are
  ...
  kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kprobe_test7_result unexpected kprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1
  ...
  kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kretprobe_test7_result unexpected kretprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1

clang17 does not have this issue.

Further investigation shows that kernel func bpf_fentry_test7(), used
in the above tests, is inlined by the compiler although it is
marked as noinline.

  int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
  {
        return (long)arg;
  }

It is known that for simple functions like the above (e.g. just returning
a constant or an input argument), the clang compiler may still do inlining
for a noinline function. Adding 'asm volatile ("")' in the beginning of the
bpf_fentry_test7() can prevent inlining.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2023
With latest clang18, I hit test_progs failures for the following test:
  #13/2    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
  #13/3    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
  #13      bpf_cookie:FAIL
  #75      fentry_fexit:FAIL
  #76/1    fentry_test/fentry:FAIL
  #76      fentry_test:FAIL
  #80/1    fexit_test/fexit:FAIL
  #80      fexit_test:FAIL
  #110/1   kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL
  #110/2   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL
  #110/3   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms:FAIL
  #110/4   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_pattern:FAIL
  #110/5   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs:FAIL
  #110/6   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_syms:FAIL
  #110     kprobe_multi_test:FAIL

For example, for #13/2, the error messages are
  ...
  kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kprobe_test7_result unexpected kprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1
  ...
  kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kretprobe_test7_result unexpected kretprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1

clang17 does not have this issue.

Further investigation shows that kernel func bpf_fentry_test7(), used
in the above tests, is inlined by the compiler although it is
marked as noinline.

  int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
  {
        return (long)arg;
  }

It is known that for simple functions like the above (e.g. just returning
a constant or an input argument), the clang compiler may still do inlining
for a noinline function. Adding 'asm volatile ("")' in the beginning of the
bpf_fentry_test7() can prevent inlining.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
With latest clang18, I hit test_progs failures for the following test:

  #13/2    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
  #13/3    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
  #13      bpf_cookie:FAIL
  #75      fentry_fexit:FAIL
  #76/1    fentry_test/fentry:FAIL
  #76      fentry_test:FAIL
  #80/1    fexit_test/fexit:FAIL
  #80      fexit_test:FAIL
  #110/1   kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL
  #110/2   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL
  #110/3   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms:FAIL
  #110/4   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_pattern:FAIL
  #110/5   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs:FAIL
  #110/6   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_syms:FAIL
  #110     kprobe_multi_test:FAIL

For example, for #13/2, the error messages are:

  [...]
  kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kprobe_test7_result unexpected kprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1
  [...]
  kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kretprobe_test7_result unexpected kretprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1

clang17 does not have this issue.

Further investigation shows that kernel func bpf_fentry_test7(), used in
the above tests, is inlined by the compiler although it is marked as
noinline.

  int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
  {
        return (long)arg;
  }

It is known that for simple functions like the above (e.g. just returning
a constant or an input argument), the clang compiler may still do inlining
for a noinline function. Adding 'asm volatile ("")' in the beginning of the
bpf_fentry_test7() can prevent inlining.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230826200843.2210074-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
With latest clang18, I hit test_progs failures for the following test:
  #13/2    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
  #13/3    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
  #13      bpf_cookie:FAIL
  #75      fentry_fexit:FAIL
  #76/1    fentry_test/fentry:FAIL
  #76      fentry_test:FAIL
  #80/1    fexit_test/fexit:FAIL
  #80      fexit_test:FAIL
  #110/1   kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL
  #110/2   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL
  #110/3   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_syms:FAIL
  #110/4   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_pattern:FAIL
  #110/5   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs:FAIL
  #110/6   kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_syms:FAIL
  #110     kprobe_multi_test:FAIL

For example, for #13/2, the error messages are
  ...
  kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kprobe_test7_result unexpected kprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1
  ...
  kprobe_multi_test_run:FAIL:kretprobe_test7_result unexpected kretprobe_test7_result: actual 0 != expected 1

clang17 does not have this issue.

Further investigation shows that kernel func bpf_fentry_test7(), used
in the above tests, is inlined by the compiler although it is
marked as noinline.

  int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
  {
        return (long)arg;
  }

It is known that for simple functions like the above (e.g. just returning
a constant or an input argument), the clang compiler may still do inlining
for a noinline function. Adding 'asm volatile ("")' in the beginning of the
bpf_fentry_test7() can prevent inlining.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2025
Specify the threshold for dumping offcpu samples with --off-cpu-thresh,
the unit is milliseconds. Default value is 500ms.

Example:

  perf record --off-cpu --off-cpu-thresh 824

The example above collects direct off-cpu samples where the off-cpu time
is longer than 824ms.

Committer testing:

After commenting out the end off-cpu dump to have just the ones that are
added right after the task is scheduled back, and using a threshould of
1000ms, we see some periods (the 5th column, just before "offcpu-time"
in the 'perf script' output) that are over 1000.000.000 nanoseconds:

  root@number:~# perf record --off-cpu --off-cpu-thresh 10000
  ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 3.902 MB perf.data (34335 samples) ]
  root@number:~# perf script
<SNIP>
  Isolated Web Co   59932 [028] 63839.594437: 1000049427 offcpu-time:
             7fe63c7976c2 __syscall_cancel_arch_end+0x0 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
             7fe63c78c04c __futex_abstimed_wait_common+0x7c (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
             7fe63c78e928 pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2+0x178 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
             5599974a9fe7 mozilla::detail::ConditionVariableImpl::wait_for(mozilla::detail::MutexImpl&, mozilla::BaseTimeDuration<mozilla::TimeDurationValueCalculator> const&)+0xe7 (/usr/lib64/fir>
                100000000 [unknown] ([unknown])

          swapper       0 [025] 63839.594459:     195724    cycles:P:  ffffffffac328270 read_tsc+0x0 ([kernel.kallsyms])
  Isolated Web Co   59932 [010] 63839.594466: 1000055278 offcpu-time:
             7fe63c7976c2 __syscall_cancel_arch_end+0x0 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
             7fe63c78ba24 __syscall_cancel+0x14 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
             7fe63c804c4e __poll+0x1e (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
             7fe633b0d1b8 PollWrapper(_GPollFD*, unsigned int, int) [clone .lto_priv.0]+0xf8 (/usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so)
                10000002c [unknown] ([unknown])

          swapper       0 [027] 63839.594475:     134433    cycles:P:  ffffffffad4c45d9 irqentry_enter+0x19 ([kernel.kallsyms])
          swapper       0 [028] 63839.594499:     215838    cycles:P:  ffffffffac39199a switch_mm_irqs_off+0x10a ([kernel.kallsyms])
  MediaPD~oder #1 1407676 [027] 63839.594514:     134433    cycles:P:      7f982ef5e69f dct_IV(int*, int, int*)+0x24f (/usr/lib64/libfdk-aac.so.2.0.0)
          swapper       0 [024] 63839.594524:     267411    cycles:P:  ffffffffad4c6ee6 poll_idle+0x56 ([kernel.kallsyms])
  MediaSu~sor #75 1093827 [026] 63839.594555:     332652    cycles:P:      55be753ad030 moz_xmalloc+0x200 (/usr/lib64/firefox/firefox)
          swapper       0 [027] 63839.594616:     160548    cycles:P:  ffffffffad144840 menu_select+0x570 ([kernel.kallsyms])
  Isolated Web Co   14019 [027] 63839.595120: 1000050178 offcpu-time:
             7fc9537cc6c2 __syscall_cancel_arch_end+0x0 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
             7fc9537c104c __futex_abstimed_wait_common+0x7c (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
             7fc9537c3928 pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2+0x178 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
             7fc95372a3c8 pt_TimedWait+0xb8 (/usr/lib64/libnspr4.so)
             7fc95372a8d8 PR_WaitCondVar+0x68 (/usr/lib64/libnspr4.so)
             7fc94afb1f7c WatchdogMain(void*)+0xac (/usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so)
             7fc947498660 [unknown] ([unknown])
             7fc9535fce88 [unknown] ([unknown])
             7fc94b620e60 WatchdogManager::~WatchdogManager()+0x0 (/usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so)
          fff8548387f8b48 [unknown] ([unknown])

          swapper       0 [003] 63839.595712:     212948    cycles:P:  ffffffffacd5b865 acpi_os_read_port+0x55 ([kernel.kallsyms])
<SNIP>

Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241108204137.2444151-2-howardchu95@gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250501022809.449767-10-howardchu95@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants