Skip to content

"direct competition" #2

@Dieterbe

Description

@Dieterbe

Hello!

I see on fcl.dev that you introduce the term "direct" competition

What is a competing use under the FCL? Under the FCL, a competing use is any use case that competes with the business interests of the author. For most projects licensed under the FCL, this will mean direct SaaS competition, (...)
(...) But since the FCL transitions to Open Source after 2 years, any user is free to use an Open Source version of the project for direct competition.

and on X, it seems you separate competition from "direct" competition
(https://x.com/keygen_sh/status/1820883043386847268)

It seems to me, introducing the word "direct" does harm than good. legally, it means nothing (AFAIK), and colloquially it means something different.

Colloqually, i believe indirect competition is like netflix vs blockbuster (both delivering entertainment, but via very different services/products) and direct competition is like netflix vs disney streaming (both streaming content). note that netflix and disney may use very different software stacks to achieve this). The competition which FSL and FCL forbid is when delivering the same (or similar) service, using the same fair source software.

I don't see the usage of the term "direct" anywhere on the Fair Source page or in the FSL, and suggest it may be better to not introduce a new, and potentially confusing term when talking about FCL.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions