Add support for providing prisma transaction options #9280
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit e3c252c:
|
closes keystonejs#9265 - add options support to context.transaction - add prismaTypes field to TypeInfo for passing through the Prisma namespace of the generated client
acburdine
force-pushed
the
transaction-passthrough
branch
from
93b29f9 to
e3c252c
Compare
gautamsi
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2024
dcousens
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2024
Member
dcousens
left a comment
dcousens
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, I want to think about the prismaTypes situ, but I doubt there is a better proposal than this
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #9265
I added the
prismaTypespassthrough so that I could access the TransactionIsolationLevel enum, but i'm not sure if that's the best approach to do it. Happy to remove that bit if it doesn't make sense.