Skip to content

Conversation

@andostronaut
Copy link
Member

@andostronaut andostronaut commented Oct 23, 2024

This is an automated pull request for branch develop

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced an FAQ section with an accordion interface for displaying frequently asked questions.
    • Added new accordion components for enhanced user interaction.
  • Enhancements

    • Improved page layout by integrating the FAQ section between existing components.
    • Updated Tailwind CSS configuration to include new animations for accordion transitions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced class name handling for improved styling consistency.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several changes, including the addition of a new dependency @radix-ui/react-accordion to package.json. A new functional React component named FAQ is created in src/components/sections/faq.tsx, which utilizes an accordion interface for displaying frequently asked questions. The accordion components are defined in src/components/ui/accordion.tsx, implementing Radix UI primitives. Additionally, the src/pages/index.tsx file is updated to include the FAQ component, and the Tailwind CSS configuration in tailwind.config.ts is modified to add new animations for the accordion.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
package.json Added dependency: "@radix-ui/react-accordion": "^1.2.1"
src/components/sections/faq.tsx Added new functional component FAQ for displaying FAQs using an accordion interface.
src/components/ui/accordion.tsx Introduced Accordion, AccordionItem, AccordionTrigger, and AccordionContent components using Radix UI.
src/pages/index.tsx Imported FAQ component and updated class name assignment using cn utility function.
tailwind.config.ts Added new animations: 'accordion-down' and 'accordion-up' with corresponding keyframes.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: create hero section #11: The changes in this PR involve adding a new dependency to package.json, similar to the main PR which also updates package.json to include a new dependency.

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, a new feature blooms,
With accordions to hold all the questions and glooms.
From package.json to the pages we see,
A FAQ for all, as easy as can be!
With animations that dance, oh what a delight,
Hopping through changes, our future looks bright! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/sections/faq.tsx (1)

12-17: Consider improving accessibility

While the structure is good, we can enhance accessibility for screen readers.

Add ARIA attributes to improve the heading hierarchy:

- <h2 className='text-lg text-primary text-center mb-2 tracking-wider'>FAQS</h2>
+ <h2 className='text-lg text-primary text-center mb-2 tracking-wider' aria-label="Frequently Asked Questions">FAQS</h2>

- <h2 className='text-3xl md:text-4xl text-center font-bold'>Common Questions</h2>
+ <h3 className='text-3xl md:text-4xl text-center font-bold'>Common Questions</h3>
package.json (1)

13-13: LGTM! Remember to run pnpm install.

The addition of @radix-ui/react-accordion aligns well with the existing Radix UI components in the project. The version specification follows the same pattern as other Radix dependencies.

Don't forget to run pnpm install to update the lockfile if you haven't already.

src/pages/index.tsx (1)

58-58: Simplify className assignment.

The cn utility is designed for conditional class merging, but it's currently being used with a single static class in an array. This adds unnecessary complexity.

Consider simplifying to:

-      <div className={cn([inter.className])}>
+      <div className={inter.className}>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f26d126 and 1756358.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/components/sections/faq.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/ui/accordion.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/pages/index.tsx (3 hunks)
  • tailwind.config.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/components/sections/faq.tsx (1)

1-8: LGTM! Clean import structure

The imports are well-organized, separating UI components and data dependencies.

src/components/ui/accordion.tsx (2)

1-8: LGTM! Good choice of dependencies.

The implementation uses Radix UI which provides excellent accessibility features out of the box. The imports are well-organized and the aliasing pattern for the Root component is clean.


55-55: LGTM! Clean export pattern.

The named exports pattern is clean and follows React best practices.

tailwind.config.ts (2)

61-63: LGTM! Animation definitions are well-configured.

The animation durations and timing functions are appropriate for accordion interactions, providing a smooth user experience without being too slow or too fast.


70-85: LGTM! Well-implemented keyframe animations.

The keyframe definitions follow best practices by:

  • Using Radix UI's --radix-accordion-content-height custom property for dynamic height calculations
  • Properly handling both expanding and collapsing states
  • Maintaining symmetrical animations for both directions
src/pages/index.tsx (2)

10-10: LGTM: Import statements follow project conventions.

The new imports maintain the existing organization pattern and use the correct path aliases.

Also applies to: 14-14


82-82: Verify FAQ component accessibility features.

The FAQ section's placement in the page hierarchy looks good. Since this uses Radix UI's accordion component, let's verify that all accessibility features are properly implemented.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the FAQ component's implementation and accessibility features.

This will help us verify:

  1. The actual implementation of the FAQ component
  2. Whether it's using Radix UI's Accordion component
  3. How accessibility features are implemented (if present)

Let me analyze the results of these commands before making a final determination or running additional checks.


Let me check the implementation of the Accordion components since they're imported from a local UI components directory.

This will help us verify if the local Accordion components properly implement Radix UI's accessible accordion with all the necessary ARIA attributes and keyboard interactions.


FAQ component's accessibility implementation is properly handled

The implementation is using Radix UI's Accordion primitives correctly, which provides built-in accessibility features:

  • Proper ARIA attributes through AccordionPrimitive components
  • Keyboard navigation support built into Radix UI primitives
  • Semantic HTML structure with proper header and trigger elements
  • Visual indicators for state changes (chevron rotation)
  • Appropriate animation states for opening/closing

The component follows accessibility best practices by leveraging Radix UI's battle-tested primitives rather than implementing custom accordion behavior.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if FAQ component implements required accessibility attributes

# Test 1: Check for ARIA attributes in FAQ component
echo "Checking for ARIA attributes in FAQ component..."
rg -A 5 'aria-|role=' src/components/sections/faq.tsx

# Test 2: Check if keyboard navigation handlers are implemented
echo "Checking for keyboard event handlers..."
rg -A 5 'onKeyDown|onKeyPress|onKeyUp' src/components/sections/faq.tsx

Length of output: 324


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's check if the file exists and see its content
echo "Checking FAQ component implementation..."
fd -t f "faq.tsx" src/ --exec cat {}

# Also check for Radix UI Accordion imports and usage
echo -e "\nChecking Radix UI Accordion usage..."
rg -l "from '@radix-ui/react-accordion'" src/

Length of output: 1171


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of the local Accordion components
echo "Checking local Accordion component implementation..."
fd -t f "accordion.tsx" src/ --exec cat {}

Length of output: 2167

@andostronaut andostronaut merged commit 8f5ae95 into main Oct 23, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants