feat: downgrade to next 14 and setup nextra #6
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the removal of the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/lib/utils.ts (1)
4-6: Consider using a more descriptive function name.While the implementation is correct and follows best practices, the function name
cncould be more descriptive. Consider renaming it toclassNamesorcombineClassesfor better code readability.-export const cn = (...inputs: ClassValue[]) => { +export const classNames = (...inputs: ClassValue[]) => { return twMerge(clsx(inputs)); };package.json (1)
12-15: Consider documenting the UI system setupThe addition of UI-related packages (
@radix-ui/react-icons,class-variance-authority,clsx,lucide-react,tailwind-merge,tailwindcss-animate) suggests setting up a component library. Consider adding documentation about:
- The chosen UI architecture
- Component composition patterns
- Usage guidelines
Would you like me to help create a documentation template for the UI system?
Also applies to: 21-22
tailwind.config.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-65: Consider Nextra compatibilitySince this configuration is part of a Next.js downgrade and Nextra setup, ensure that:
- All Nextra-specific components will properly inherit these theme configurations
- The content paths include Nextra's MDX files and components
Consider adding Nextra's paths to the content array:
content: [ "./src/pages/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx,mdx}", "./src/components/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx,mdx}", "./src/app/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx,mdx}", + "./theme.config.tsx", + "./src/content/**/*.mdx" ],src/styles/globals.css (1)
Line range hint
5-21: Remove duplicate CSS variable definitions.The original CSS variables (lines 5-21) are now redundant as they're being replaced by a more comprehensive HSL-based theming system. These older definitions should be removed to prevent confusion and potential maintenance issues.
Apply this diff to remove the duplicate definitions:
-:root { - --background: #ffffff; - --foreground: #171717; -} - -@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) { - :root { - --background: #0a0a0a; - --foreground: #ededed; - } -} - -body { - color: var(--foreground); - background: var(--background); - font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -}src/components/kinotio-logo.tsx (1)
1-63: Consider adding size constraints.While the SVG viewBox is defined, it's recommended to add default width/height props or CSS constraints to prevent layout shifts and ensure consistent rendering across different contexts.
Example implementation:
export const KinotioLogo = ( - props: React.ComponentProps<"svg"> + props: React.ComponentProps<"svg"> & { + width?: number | string; + height?: number | string; + } ): React.ReactElement => ( <svg viewBox="0 0 2199 648" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" role="img" aria-label="Kinotio" + width={props.width ?? "100%"} + height={props.height ?? "auto"} {...props} >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- .eslintrc.json (0 hunks)
- components.json (1 hunks)
- next.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- next.config.ts (0 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/components/kinotio-logo.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/data/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/lib/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- src/styles/globals.css (1 hunks)
- tailwind.config.ts (2 hunks)
- theme.config.tsx (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .eslintrc.json
- next.config.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (20)
src/lib/utils.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Appropriate utility imports for class name management.The imports are well-structured and use proper typing.
8-8: LGTM! Simple and effective implementation.The function serves its purpose well for a copyright notice. Note that it uses the system's local timezone, which is acceptable for this use case.
next.config.mjs (1)
1-2: LGTM! Proper type annotation and import.The TypeScript type annotation for NextConfig and the ESM import syntax are correctly implemented.
tsconfig.json (1)
20-20: LGTM! Including next.config.mjs for type checking.The addition of "next.config.mjs" to the include array is correct and necessary for TypeScript to type-check the new Next.js configuration file.
Let's verify the existence of the next.config.mjs file:
✅ Verification successful
The verification results show that
next.config.mjsexists and contains Nextra-related configuration, which confirms that including it intsconfig.jsonis correct and necessary. Let me check the actual content of the file to ensure it's properly configured:
Including next.config.mjs in tsconfig.json is correct and properly configured
The verification confirms that:
next.config.mjsexists and is a valid Next.js/Nextra configuration file- It uses TypeScript types (
@type {import('next').NextConfig})- It properly configures Nextra with the docs theme
- The file is an ESM module (
.mjsextension), matching the import/export syntax usedTherefore, including it in
tsconfig.json'sincludearray is necessary for proper TypeScript type checking.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that next.config.mjs exists and contains Nextra configuration # Expect: File exists and contains Nextra-related configuration if [ -f "next.config.mjs" ]; then echo "next.config.mjs exists" # Look for Nextra configuration rg -l "nextra" next.config.mjs else echo "Error: next.config.mjs is missing" exit 1 fiLength of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the content of next.config.mjs to verify it's a proper Next.js/Nextra config cat next.config.mjsLength of output: 250
theme.config.tsx (3)
1-8: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The imports are logically grouped and follow Next.js conventions with proper use of absolute imports.
40-40: LGTM! Clean export.The export statement follows TypeScript best practices.
20-26: Verify external URLs from DATA object.The configuration uses external URLs from the DATA object. Ensure these URLs are properly validated and always include the protocol (https://).
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from the shell script, I can now generate the final response since I have verified all the URLs in the DATA object.
All URLs in DATA object are properly formatted with HTTPS protocol ✓
The verification confirms that all external URLs in the DATA object (
repo,doc_repo, and social URLs) are properly formatted with the HTTPS protocol:
url: https://docs.kinotio.iosocial_url.linkedin: https://linkedin.com/company/kinotiosocial_url.x: https://x.com/kinotiodotiorepo: https://github.com/kinotio/docsdoc_repo: https://github.com/kinotio/docs/tree/main🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the format of URLs in the DATA object # Expected: All URLs should start with https:// for security # Search for URL declarations in data files rg -A 1 "(?:repo|url|link).*[:=].*['\"].*['\"]" src/data/Length of output: 511
package.json (3)
6-6: LGTM: Removal of experimental turbo flagRemoving the
--turboflag is appropriate when downgrading to Next.js 14 and setting up Nextra to ensure stable development environment.
34-60: LGTM: Well-structured configuration setupThe new prettier and eslint configurations are well-organized:
- Comprehensive prettier rules with proper overrides for CSS/SCSS files
- Essential eslint extensions for Next.js and TypeScript
- Moving eslint config to package.json while removing .eslintrc.json maintains cleaner project structure
16-16: Verify compatibility with Next.js 14Please ensure that all Next.js features used in the codebase are compatible with version 14.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Next.js usage in the codebase to make a more informed decision.
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the Next.js usage in the codebase.
Next.js 14 downgrade is compatible with current usage
The codebase uses standard Next.js features that are fully supported in version 14:
- Basic imports like
next/link,next/image,next/font/local- Standard Pages Router structure (
src/pages/)- Core components like
Document,App- No usage of experimental features or App Router
- No advanced features that might have compatibility issues
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Next.js 15-specific features that might break in v14 # Test: Search for potential incompatible features echo "Checking for App Router features that might have changed..." rg -l "use server" || true rg -l "use client" || true rg -l "generateStaticParams" || true echo "Checking for experimental features usage..." rg -l "experimental" || trueLength of output: 345
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for Next.js specific imports and configurations # Check for Next.js specific imports and features echo "Checking Next.js imports and features..." rg "from 'next/" -A 2 || true rg "from \"next/" -A 2 || true # Check next.config.js for any specific configurations echo -e "\nChecking Next.js configuration..." find . -name "next.config.js" -exec cat {} \; || true # Check for app directory structure (Next.js 13+ App Router) echo -e "\nChecking for App Router usage..." fd -t d "^app$" || true # Check for pages directory (Pages Router) echo -e "\nChecking for Pages Router usage..." fd -t d "^pages$" || trueLength of output: 1161
tailwind.config.ts (4)
2-5: LGTM: Proper setup for dark mode and animation supportThe class-based dark mode strategy is the recommended approach for Next.js applications, and the addition of tailwindcss-animate provides robust animation capabilities.
55-58: LGTM: Consistent border radius systemThe border radius configuration uses a maintainable approach with calculated variants based on a single CSS variable.
62-62: LGTM: Plugin configuration is correctThe tailwindcss-animate plugin is properly configured in the plugins array.
14-54: Well-structured color system implementationThe HSL-based color system with semantic naming is well-organized and follows best practices. The use of CSS variables provides flexibility for theming.
Let's verify that all CSS variables are properly defined:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to locate and verify the CSS variable definitions.
This script will help us:
- Identify all CSS files in the project
- Find files that contain root-level CSS definitions
- Look for the specific color-related CSS variable definitions we need to verify
CSS variables are properly defined and well-organized
All CSS variables used in the Tailwind configuration are correctly defined in
src/styles/globals.csswith both light and dark theme variations. The implementation includes:
- Complete set of semantic color variables matching the Tailwind config
- HSL values for all colors enabling proper color manipulation
- Dark theme overrides with appropriate contrast values
- Chart color variables (1-5) defined for both themes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all CSS variables used in the color system are defined in the CSS files # Expected: All variables should be defined in globals.css or similar files echo "Checking for CSS variable definitions..." rg --type css "(:root|\.dark)" -A 50 | grep -E "^[^-]*--((background|foreground|card|popover|primary|secondary|muted|accent|destructive|border|input|ring|chart)|-foreground)"Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's find all CSS files in the project echo "Finding CSS files..." fd -e css # Then, let's look for any file that might contain CSS variable definitions echo -e "\nSearching for CSS variable definitions..." rg -l "(:root|\.dark)" --type css # Finally, let's examine the content of these files echo -e "\nExamining CSS variable content..." rg --type css -B 1 -A 3 "(--background|--foreground|--card|--popover|--primary|--secondary|--muted|--accent|--destructive|--border|--input|--ring|--chart)"Length of output: 3927
src/styles/globals.css (3)
24-50: Well-structured light theme implementation!The light theme variables are well-organized and follow best practices:
- HSL color format enables better color manipulation
- Semantic naming provides clear context
- Comprehensive coverage of UI elements and chart colors
51-76: Verify contrast ratios for dark theme chart colors.While the dark theme implementation is well-structured, please verify that the chart colors (lines 71-75) maintain sufficient contrast ratios against dark backgrounds for accessibility compliance.
You can use tools like WebAIM's Contrast Checker to verify these colors meet WCAG guidelines.
79-86: Clean and efficient base layer implementation!The base layer styles effectively apply theme variables using Tailwind's conventions. The implementation is clean and maintainable.
src/data/index.ts (1)
39-44: Review help section implementationTwo potential issues to address:
- The fragment identifier "#faq" might not work as expected with Next.js routing
- The help section could be expanded to include more useful links (e.g., GitHub issues, contact)
#!/bin/bash # Check if there's any client-side scroll handling for the FAQ section rg -l "getElementById.*faq|querySelector.*faq" --type ts --type tsxsrc/components/kinotio-logo.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM! Well-typed component declaration.The component is properly typed with React.ComponentProps<"svg">, allowing it to accept all standard SVG attributes.
4-11: LGTM! Excellent accessibility implementation.The SVG implementation includes proper accessibility attributes:
- role="img" to indicate it's an image
- aria-label="Kinotio" for screen readers
- Proper props spreading via {...props} for customization
This is an automated pull request for branch develop
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
components.jsonfor better component management.KinotioLogofor branding.DATAobject for the Kinotio documentation platform.theme.config.tsxfor documentation styling.Improvements
Bug Fixes
Chores