Refactor/evidence refactors #49
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates focus on refining evidence handling across multiple files and components in the project. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ChallengeItemModal
participant usePrepareCurateV2ChallengeRequest
participant useCurateV2ChallengeRequest
participant CurateV2Contract
User ->> ChallengeItemModal: Inputs challenge data
ChallengeItemModal ->> usePrepareCurateV2ChallengeRequest: Prepare challenge request
usePrepareCurateV2ChallengeRequest ->> ChallengeItemModal: Return prepared config
ChallengeItemModal ->> useCurateV2ChallengeRequest: Submit challenge request
useCurateV2ChallengeRequest ->> CurateV2Contract: Call challengeRequest method
CurateV2Contract -->> useCurateV2ChallengeRequest: Acknowledge receipt
useCurateV2ChallengeRequest -->> ChallengeItemModal: Return transaction status
User ->> RemoveModal: Inputs removal data
RemoveModal ->> usePrepareCurateV2RemoveItem: Prepare removal request
usePrepareCurateV2RemoveItem ->> RemoveModal: Return prepared config
RemoveModal ->> useCurateV2RemoveItem: Submit removal request
useCurateV2RemoveItem ->> CurateV2Contract: Call removeItem method
CurateV2Contract -->> useCurateV2RemoveItem: Acknowledge receipt
useCurateV2RemoveItem -->> RemoveModal: Return transaction status
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for curate-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- contracts/src/CurateV2.sol (2 hunks)
- web/src/components/ActionButton/Modal/ChallengeItemModal.tsx (5 hunks)
- web/src/components/ActionButton/Modal/RemoveModal.tsx (5 hunks)
- web/src/components/HistoryDisplay/Party/JustificationDetails.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/components/HistoryDisplay/Party/JustificationModal.tsx (4 hunks)
- web/src/hooks/queries/useEvidences.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
web/src/components/HistoryDisplay/Party/JustificationModal.tsx
[error] 102-104: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
Additional comments not posted (17)
web/src/hooks/queries/useEvidences.ts (1)
13-15: LGTM! Ensure new fields are handled correctly.The added fields
name,description, andfileURIin the GraphQL query look good. Ensure these fields are correctly handled in the rest of the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure new fields are handled correctly.
The added fields
name,description, andfileURIin the GraphQL query look good. These fields are referenced and utilized in various parts of the codebase, including:
web/src/hooks/queries/useEvidences.tsweb/src/components/HistoryDisplay/Party/JustificationDetails.tsxweb/src/components/ActionButton/Modal/EvidenceUpload.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the fields `name`, `description`, and `fileURI` are handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of these fields. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type typescript 'name|description|fileURI'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the fields `name`, `description`, and `fileURI` are handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of these fields. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type ts 'name|description|fileURI'Length of output: 21575
web/src/components/HistoryDisplay/Party/JustificationDetails.tsx (2)
7-7: LGTM! Ensure the new type aligns with the expected structure.The updated
Justificationtype to use a subset of fields from theEvidencetype looks good. Ensure this new type aligns with the expected structure in the rest of the codebase.Verification successful
The
Justificationtype is correctly aligned with the expected structure.The changes made to use a subset of fields from the
Evidencetype for theJustificationtype are properly reflected in the components. The type is correctly defined and used in the relevant files.
web/src/components/HistoryDisplay/Party/JustificationDetails.tsxweb/src/components/HistoryDisplay/Party/JustificationModal.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new `Justification` type aligns with the expected structure in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `Justification` type. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type typescript 'Justification'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new `Justification` type aligns with the expected structure in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `Justification` type in TypeScript files. rg 'Justification' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 3326
41-43: LGTM! Ensure null handling is consistent.The null handling for
justification.nameandjustification.descriptionlooks good. Ensure this null handling is consistent throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Null handling is consistent.
The null handling for
justification.nameandjustification.descriptionis only present in the reviewed file. There are no other occurrences of these fields in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that null handling for `justification.name` and `justification.description` is consistent in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of these fields. Expect: Proper null handling in relevant files. rg --type typescript 'justification\.name|justification\.description'Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that null handling for `justification.name` and `justification.description` is consistent in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of these fields. Expect: Proper null handling in relevant files. rg --type ts 'justification\.name|justification\.description'Length of output: 396
web/src/components/HistoryDisplay/Party/JustificationModal.tsx (3)
65-65: LGTM! Ensure loading states are handled correctly.The handling of loading states in the
JustificationModalcomponent looks good. Ensure these states are correctly handled in the rest of the codebase.
54-57: LGTM! Ensure evidence data and state updates are handled correctly.The handling of evidence data and state updates in the
JustificationModalcomponent looks good. Ensure these operations are correctly handled in the rest of the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure evidence data and state updates are handled correctly.
The handling of evidence data and state updates in the
JustificationModalcomponent looks good. The usage is confined to theJustificationModal.tsxfile, indicating localized handling.
web/src/components/HistoryDisplay/Party/JustificationModal.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that evidence data and state updates are handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of evidence data and state updates. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type typescript 'evidenceData|setJustification'Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that evidence data and state updates are handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of evidence data and state updates. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg 'evidenceData|setJustification' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 826
110-111: LGTM! Ensure evidence matching logic is correct.The evidence matching logic looks good. Ensure this logic is correctly handled in the rest of the codebase.
Verification successful
Evidence matching logic is correctly handled within the scope of
JustificationModal.tsx.
- The function
getEvidenceForRequestis only used withinweb/src/components/HistoryDisplay/Party/JustificationModal.tsx.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that evidence matching logic is handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of evidence matching logic. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type typescript 'getEvidenceForRequest'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that evidence matching logic is handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of evidence matching logic. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type ts 'getEvidenceForRequest'Length of output: 282
web/src/components/ActionButton/Modal/RemoveModal.tsx (3)
63-66: LGTM! Ensure evidence validation and disabling logic are handled correctly.The evidence validation and disabling logic look good. Ensure these operations are correctly handled in the rest of the codebase.
Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure evidence validation and disabling logic are handled correctly.
The evidence validation and disabling logic are utilized correctly across the codebase.
isEvidenceValidandisDisabledare used in relevant files such asRemoveModal.tsx,ChallengeItemModal.tsx, andResubmitModal.tsx.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that evidence validation and disabling logic are handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of these operations. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type typescript 'isEvidenceValid|isDisabled'Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that evidence validation and disabling logic are handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of these operations. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type ts 'isEvidenceValid|isDisabled'Length of output: 2657
68-75: LGTM! Ensure preparation configuration is handled correctly.The preparation configuration for
usePrepareCurateV2RemoveItemlooks good. Ensure this configuration is correctly handled in the rest of the codebase.Verification successful
Preparation configuration is correctly handled within
RemoveModal.tsxThe
usePrepareCurateV2RemoveItemhook is only used withinweb/src/components/ActionButton/Modal/RemoveModal.tsx. This indicates that the preparation configuration is handled correctly and does not impact other parts of the codebase.
web/src/components/ActionButton/Modal/RemoveModal.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that preparation configuration is handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of preparation configuration. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type typescript 'usePrepareCurateV2RemoveItem'Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that preparation configuration is handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of preparation configuration. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type ts 'usePrepareCurateV2RemoveItem'Length of output: 235
108-116: LGTM! Ensure removal logic and state updates are handled correctly.The removal logic and state updates look good. Ensure these operations are correctly handled in the rest of the codebase.
Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure removal logic and state updates are handled correctly.
The removal logic and state updates are correctly handled within the
RemoveModal.tsxfile and do not impact other parts of the codebase.
web/src/components/ActionButton/Modal/RemoveModal.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that removal logic and state updates are handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of these operations. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg --type typescript 'removeItem|setIsRemovingItem'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that removal logic and state updates are handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of these operations. Expect: Proper handling in relevant files. rg 'removeItem|setIsRemovingItem' --glob '**/*.ts' --glob '**/*.tsx'Length of output: 929
web/src/components/ActionButton/Modal/ChallengeItemModal.tsx (6)
8-12: Import statements refactored.The import statements have been updated to use
useCurateV2ChallengeRequestandusePrepareCurateV2ChallengeRequestinstead ofprepareWriteCurateV2. This refactor improves clarity and modularity by using specific hooks.
20-20: New import added.The
isUndefinedutility function is imported fromsrc/utils. Ensure this utility function is properly tested and handles all edge cases.
84-87: RefactoredisDisabledlogic.The logic for determining if the challenge button should be disabled has been refactored. The conditions are now more readable and maintainable. Ensure that the
isEvidenceValidandisEvidenceUploadingstates are correctly managed.
89-96: RefactoredusePrepareCurateV2ChallengeRequesthook.The
usePrepareCurateV2ChallengeRequesthook is now used with aconfigobject. This refactor improves code readability and maintainability. Ensure theenabled,address,functionName,args, andvalueproperties are correctly set.
98-98: UpdatedchallengeRequestfunction.The
challengeRequestfunction now uses theuseCurateV2ChallengeRequesthook with the prepared config. This change enhances modularity and clarity.
131-140: Updated challenge callback logic.The callback logic for the challenge button has been updated to use the new
challengeRequestfunction. The asynchronous call is wrapped withwrapWithToastfor better user feedback. Ensure proper error handling and state management in the callback.contracts/src/CurateV2.sol (2)
395-395: Updated parameter description for_evidence.The parameter description for
_evidencein theremoveItemfunction has been updated to include a stringified evidence object example. This improves the documentation and provides clarity on the expected format of the_evidenceparameter.
433-433: Updated parameter description for_evidence.The parameter description for
_evidencein thechallengeRequestfunction has been updated to include a stringified evidence object example. This improves the documentation and provides clarity on the expected format of the_evidenceparameter.
PR-Codex overview
This PR updates components related to justifications and evidence handling.
Detailed summary
Justificationtype inJustificationDetails.tsxJustificationModal.tsxSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
name,description, andfileURI.Refactor
Bug Fixes
nameanddescriptionproperties in justification details.These changes aim to enhance the user experience by providing more detailed evidence information and streamlining the challenge and removal processes.