Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use proper error for missing field for pobe #5713

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 30, 2019

Conversation

nak3
Copy link
Contributor

@nak3 nak3 commented Sep 28, 2019

Proposed Changes

When livenessProbe or readinessProbe missed one of probes, it gives
ErrMissingField("handler"). But actually the handler field does not
exist in the spec - pod.spec.containers.livenessProbe.

This patch changes the error to apis.ErrMissingOneOf.

/lint

Release Note

NONE

When livenessProbe or readinessProbe missed one of `exec`, `httpGet`
or `tcpSocket`, it gives `ErrMissingField("handler")`. But the
`handler` field does not exist actually (please see `$ kubectl explain
pod.spec.containers.livenessProbe`).

Hence, this patch changes the error to `apis.ErrMissingOneOf`.
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Sep 28, 2019
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. area/API API objects and controllers labels Sep 28, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nak3: 0 warnings.

In response to this:

Proposed Changes

When livenessProbe or readinessProbe missed one of probes, it gives
ErrMissingField("handler"). But actually the handler field does not
exist in the spec - pod.spec.containers.livenessProbe.

This patch changes the error to apis.ErrMissingOneOf.

/lint

Release Note

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@vagababov vagababov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 28, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@markusthoemmes markusthoemmes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

/assign @mattmoor

Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: markusthoemmes, mattmoor, nak3, vagababov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 30, 2019
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit 3be4934 into knative:master Sep 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/API API objects and controllers cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants