bump base

[benoit-pierre]

• switch to libressl koreader-base#2010 (close PocketBook: Crash when connecting to an OPDS server via HTTPS #9422, close Pocketbook cannot update koreader #11055)

---

This change is 

[NiLuJe]

The commit hash seems wrong?

i.e., it's actually 9c75c5ad685b47d4b5195cad8d715f060e880d79 in koreader/koreader-base, but this points to 922973f2e11610fb0548dc091e1ba4843a0ce975 (your own tree?).

This leads to git rightfully failing to update the submodule:

fatal: transport 'file' not allowed
fatal: Fetched in submodule path 'base', but it did not contain 922973f2e11610fb0548dc091e1ba4843a0ce975. Direct fetching of that commit failed.

[Frenzie]

I noticed it was wrong the other day (a little too late), but it still worked out for me at the time so I ignored it in favor of the next natural base bump.

E.g., this is my local base after updating the submodule a few days ago:

commit 922973f2e11610fb0548dc091e1ba4843a0ce975 (HEAD)
Author: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Dec 12 17:10:19 2024 +0100

    [TMP] workflow dispatch

commit 9c75c5ad685b47d4b5195cad8d715f060e880d79 (origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 25 10:43:18 2024 +0100

    drop openssl in favor of libressl

[Frenzie]

I have git 2.45.2.

[NiLuJe]

Huh. Doesn't resolve on my end (git 2.47.0), but I probably don't have @benoit-pierre's remote setup in my front checkout.

(I assume if I had, it would automagically figure it out).

[Frenzie]

Neither do I though, on this particular laptop:

$ git remote -v
Commodore64user git@github.com:Commodore64user/KOReader_fork.git (fetch)
Commodore64user git@github.com:Commodore64user/KOReader_fork.git (push)
origin  git@github.com:Frenzie/koreader.git (fetch)
origin  git@github.com:Frenzie/koreader.git (push)
upstream        git@github.com:koreader/koreader.git (fetch)
upstream        git@github.com:koreader/koreader.git (push)

Which would suggests it's not related to git at all, but rather to GitHub, in which case it's most likely this (probably coupled with an x-hour undo functionality):

[benoit-pierre]

Damn, sorry about that… That's a commit I have on my master branch to be able to test workflow dispatching on derived branches.