Research JPEG encoder
Codename "Nether Poppleton"
The goal of this encoder is to produce files with best filesize/quality ratio, regardless of encoding speed or memory cost.
- Luma-weighed chroma subsampling — thin red lines on white or black background don't become desaturated.
- Less aggressive DC quantization — less banding (but more blurriness) at very low qualities.
- Derining by overflowing — less noise around black text on white background.
Download binary or compile with
./encoder source.png output.jpg 50
These are carefully chosen examples that show certain improvements. They're not indicative of overall performance (and ImageMagick's JPEG encoder is generally okay).
JPEG shouldn't be used for line art, but people still do it. Now they can fail less at it.
ImageMagick = 7721B (left), this encoder = 7349B (right)
Deringing is implemented by overshooting the white color (technique described here in detail). This way distortions are introduced out of visible range.
Color can be saved at half resolution. Poor subsampling darkens and desaturates red lines.
Original (left), ImageMagick = 7277B (middle), this encoder = 7173B (right)
This is done by weighing chroma by luma level. It can be improved further by subsampling with gamma correction and with luma corrections for out-of-range values produced by changes in chroma.
Low DC quantization
Standard JPEG encoders are not tuned for very low quality. Bad quality doesn't have to be that bad.
ImageMagick = 5033B (left), this encoder = 4890B (right)
This is done merely by tweaking quantization tables. Further improvements are possible.
Not quite failed experiments
Lossy RLE on DC
I've created algorithm for proper unbiased lossy RLE compression (I can make lossy BMP, lossy PCX and lossy IFF ILBM files!), and wanted to see if it could work when applied to JPEGs DC coefficients. It kinda does a bit, but it often becomes noticeable at 1% file size gain, so overall it may not be worth the effort. Here's a 7% improvement in file size (if you can't see the difference you're sitting too close to the monitor):
Grass and rocks at the bottom became flat and bland, but it's hard to see any difference in the trees. Any idea how to detect areas of the image that tolerate this degradation? I've tried looking for noisy areas based on amplitude of selected AC coefficients, but grass and trees have almost the same ACs.
Blurring DC quantization
JPEG stores average brightness per each 8x8 block, and heavy compression reduces number of brightness levels available (DC quantization), causing obvious blockyness.
I've tried to apply blur that smoothes edges introduced by quantization. Here's an exaggreated example that looks nice:
Unfortunately with proper quantization tables there isn't enough fidelity in higher frequencies to make a difference, and bits spent on soft edges could as well be spent on better DC in a first place.