AnnotationSpec throwing java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException instead of User Exception

[LeoColman]

When executing a test with AnnotationSpec:

class Foo : AnnotationSpec() {
  class FooException: Exception()


  @Test
  fun foo() {
    throw FooException()
  }
}

I expected the stacktrace to contain my exception and my line at the top, but instead it returns a weird Stacktrace.

This happened after changing it's execution to invokeSuspend

java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
	at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.calls.CallerImpl$Method.callMethod(CallerImpl.kt:71)
	at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.calls.CallerImpl$Method$Instance.call(CallerImpl.kt:87)
	at kotlin.reflect.jvm.internal.KCallableImpl.call(KCallableImpl.kt:106)
	at io.kotlintest.specs.AbstractAnnotationSpec$createTestCase$$inlined$let$lambda$1.invokeSuspend(AbstractAnnotationSpec.kt:76)
.....

[LeoColman]

I just discovered this isn't actually related to invokeSuspend, therefore it doesn't have anything to do with 3.2.0-RC2. It's just a bug in AnnotationSpec

Should we point it to 3.2.0 anyways, @sksamuel ?

[sksamuel]

Yeah can put it on 3.2.0 unless someone asks for it on 3.1

[LeoColman]

I meant if this should go for 3.2 or 3.3, as it's unrelated to 3.2

[sksamuel]

Yes it's a bug and we've not yet released 3.2.0 so definitely target that.