New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Go to Definition service #43

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@krvajal
Owner

krvajal commented Mar 19, 2018

Allow the user to navigate to the definition of a function call defined in the same file or in any other file in the project. The user can use both Go to Definition and Peek Definition functionality.

@daloic

This comment has been minimized.

daloic commented Sep 19, 2018

Would it be possible to integrate with the Fortran Language Server? Combining it with this simple Fortran extension we already have a very robust code navigation and error reporting (like scope masking etc.). It would be great to have all the good stuff of your extension combined with the language server.

@daloic

This comment has been minimized.

daloic commented Sep 19, 2018

It is very easy to enable the Fortran Language Server with your extension, just apply these small patches on the LS extension and add "onLanguage:fortran_fixed-form" as activation event in package.json for your extension (I also added .for as fixed format extension).

@krvajal

This comment has been minimized.

Owner

krvajal commented Sep 19, 2018

This is really nice!! I will love to have this included. I just dont have the time right now to make it happen but you seem to be in the right direction.

@daloic

This comment has been minimized.

daloic commented Sep 20, 2018

I will prepare a pull request for you and one for the language server. I will simply reference each other and create a small how-to use them. This will be done early/middle of next week.

@krvajal

This comment has been minimized.

Owner

krvajal commented Oct 14, 2018

Closing this as the suggestion by @daloic seems more attractive.

@krvajal krvajal closed this Oct 14, 2018

@krvajal krvajal deleted the pr/goto branch Oct 15, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment