Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync google group name and slack for Big Data User Group transition #3666

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 2, 2019

Conversation

@erikerlandson
Copy link
Contributor

commented May 2, 2019

Updating google group and slack to reflect the transition.
Note, the slack channel rename request is still outstanding:
#3665

@liyinan926

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented May 2, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

left a comment

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 2, 2019

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: erikerlandson, idvoretskyi, liyinan926

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8ef1fcd into kubernetes:master May 2, 2019

3 of 4 checks passed

tide Not mergeable.
Details
cla/linuxfoundation erikerlandson authorized
Details
pull-community-tempelis-check Skipped.
pull-community-verify Job succeeded.
Details
slack: ug-big-data
mailing_list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/kubernetes-ug-big-data
slack: big-data-user-group
mailing_list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/kubernetes-big-data-user-group

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@cblecker

cblecker May 3, 2019

Member

cc: @spiffxp .. do we have standards for this?

@erikerlandson

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented May 3, 2019

@mrbobbytables we could actually just revert this PR, since the proposed standard agrees with my original placeholder names.
cc @cblecker @nikhita @liyinan926

@mrbobbytables

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented May 3, 2019

That sounds like a good plan. @erikerlandson do you want to go ahead do the revert?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.